You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
when using 'grouped' plots, we'd often like to see trends/differentations between separate groups.
however, it is common that some of the groups are very 'small', thus the data shown for them is confusing (and sometunes also distorts the rest of the plot, because the range can be very large).
i think allowing specification of min_group_size (Optional[int]) can be very beneficial, mitigating this issue, and eliminating the need of boilerplate code from the user side.
thank you for all your great work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
gvwilson
changed the title
feature request: allow to specify min_group_size in graphs that include grouping (e.g. using 'color', 'facet_row/col' etc.)
allow to specify min_group_size in graphs that include grouping (e.g. using 'color', 'facet_row/col' etc.)
Aug 13, 2024
when using 'grouped' plots, we'd often like to see trends/differentations between separate groups.
however, it is common that some of the groups are very 'small', thus the data shown for them is confusing (and sometunes also distorts the rest of the plot, because the range can be very large).
i think allowing specification of min_group_size (Optional[int]) can be very beneficial, mitigating this issue, and eliminating the need of boilerplate code from the user side.
thank you for all your great work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: