-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initializing a large number of CVs #1034
Comments
PLUMED is not designed for that regime, but rather for the regime where there are a few (10-100) CVs. In addition to startup, I suspect you can have significant overhead also during the simulation if you use 10^4 CVs. There are a number of CVs that are designed to compute simpler CVs on multiple combinations of atoms (e.g., all pairwise distances in a single CV). If you are more specific about what you are trying to do we can help you to obtain the same result using less CVs |
Thanks for your reply. I indeed want to calculate all pairwise distance between two groups. Which CV do you think can calculate these quantities? |
What do you want to do with those distances? There are many variables that combine multiple pairwise distances in different manners, e.g.:
and possibly others |
Sorry for the late reply --- I was looking at the manual and the source codes of these CVs. What I want to do is to pass all pairwise distances to another CV (e.g. RESTRAINTS). It seems that I do not have access to these components in the above CVs. Also, it seems that those CVs you mentioned are not parallelized, except COORDINATION.Am I correct? |
Are all the restraints identical? If so you can easily do this with If not you might use CONTACTMAP, with a limited for for the restraint, but different reference distances. And I think it's parallelized. DRMSD might also be a good option, but I don't know if it's parallelized |
Hi PLUMED developers,
I am using GROMACS 2018. In my simulation, I need to calculate large amount (~10^4) of CVs. However, I found that it takes ~30 mins to initialize these CVs at the beginning of simulation. I am wondering why this is the case and whether there is any way to make it faster.
Thanks,
Lizhu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: