Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The term X+0 is not evaluated correctly. #218

Closed
rkaminsk opened this issue Jul 6, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #220
Closed

The term X+0 is not evaluated correctly. #218

rkaminsk opened this issue Jul 6, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #220
Assignees
@rkaminsk
Labels
bug
Milestone
v5.5.0

Comments

@rkaminsk
Copy link
Member

rkaminsk commented Jul 6, 2020

For the program

p(a).
q(X+0) :- p(X).

gringo derives q(a). This is a bug.
@rkaminsk rkaminsk added the bug label Jul 6, 2020
@rkaminsk rkaminsk added this to the v5.5.0 milestone Jul 6, 2020
@rkaminsk rkaminsk self-assigned this Jul 6, 2020
@rkaminsk rkaminsk linked a pull request Jul 7, 2020 that will close this issue
fix handling of undefined arithmetics #220
Merged
@rkaminsk rkaminsk mentioned this issue Jul 7, 2020
Open
@rkaminsk rkaminsk closed this as completed Jul 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rkaminsk rkaminsk

Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v5.5.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

fix handling of undefined arithmetics potassco/clingo
1 participant
@rkaminsk