-
Commits:
-
Make commits of logical units.
-
Check for unnecessary whitespace with "git diff --check" before committing.
-
Commit using Unix line endings (check the settings around "crlf" in git-config(1)).
-
Do not check in commented out code or unneeded files.
-
The first line of the commit message should be a short description (50 characters is the soft limit, excluding ticket number(s)), and should skip the full stop.
-
The body should provide a meaningful commit message, which:
-
uses the imperative, present tense: "change", not "changed" or "changes".
-
includes motivation for the change, and contrasts its implementation with the previous behavior.
-
-
Make sure that you have tests for the bug you are fixing, or feature you are adding.
-
Make sure the test suite passes after your commit. More information see testing below.
-
When introducing a new feature, make sure it is properly documented in the README.md
-
-
Submission:
-
Prerequisites:
-
Sign the Contributor License Agreement
-
Make sure you have a GitHub account
-
-
Preferred method:
-
Fork the repository on GitHub.
-
Push your changes to a topic branch in your fork of the repository.
-
Submit a pull request to the repository in the puppetlabs organization.
-
-
-
Make separate commits for logically separate changes.
Please break your commits down into logically consistent units which include new or changed tests relevant to the rest of the change. The goal of doing this is to make the diff easier to read for whoever is reviewing your code. In general, the easier your diff is to read, the more likely someone will be happy to review it and get it into the code base.
If you are going to refactor a piece of code, please do so as a separate commit from your feature or bug fix changes.
We also really appreciate changes that include tests to make sure the bug is not re-introduced, and that the feature is not accidentally broken.
Describe the technical detail of the change(s). If your description starts to get too long, that is a good sign that you probably need to split up your commit into more finely grained pieces.
Commits which plainly describe the things which help reviewers check the patch and future developers understand the code are much more likely to be merged in with a minimum of bike-shedding or requested changes. Ideally, the commit message would include information, and be in a form suitable for inclusion in the release notes for the version of Puppet that includes them.
Please also check that you are not introducing any trailing whitespace or other "whitespace errors". You can do this by running "git diff --check" on your changes before you commit.
-
Sign the Contributor License Agreement
Before we can accept your changes, we do need a signed Puppet Labs Contributor License Agreement (CLA).
You can access the CLA via the Contributor License Agreement link
If you have any questions about the CLA, please feel free to contact Puppet Labs via email at cla-submissions@puppetlabs.com.
-
Sending your patches
To submit your changes via a GitHub pull request, we highly recommend that you have them on a topic branch, instead of directly on "master". It makes things much easier to keep track of, especially if you decide to work on another thing before your first change is merged in.
GitHub has some pretty good general documentation on using their site. They also have documentation on creating pull requests.
In general, after pushing your topic branch up to your repository on GitHub, you can switch to the branch in the GitHub UI and click "Pull Request" towards the top of the page in order to open a pull request.
-
Update the related GitHub issue.
If there is a GitHub issue associated with the change you submitted, then you should update the ticket to include the location of your branch, along with any other commentary you may wish to make.
-
Responding to feedback.
We may have feedback for you to fix or change some things. We generally like to see that pushed against the same topic branch (it will automatically update the Pull Request). You can also fix/squash/rebase commits and push the same topic branch with -force (it's generally acceptable to do this on topic branches not in the main repository, it is generally unacceptable and should be avoided at all costs against the main repository).
The only reasons a pull request should be closed and resubmitted are as follows:
When the pull request is targeting the wrong branch (this doesn't happen as often). When there are updates made to the original by someone other than the original contributor. Then the old branch is closed with a note on the newer branch This supersedes #github_number.
Our puppet modules provide a Gemfile
which can tell a ruby
package manager such as bundler what Ruby packages,
or Gems, are required to build, develop, and test this software.
Please make sure you have bundler installed on your system, then use it to install all dependencies needed for this project, by running:
% bundle install
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/........
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/..
Using rake (10.1.0)
Using builder (3.2.2)
-- 8><-- many more --><8 --
Using bundler (1.3.5)
Your bundle is complete!
Use `bundle show [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is installed.
If you already have those gems installed, make sure they are up-to-date:
% bundle update
With all dependencies in place and up-to-date we can now run the tests:
% bundle exec rake test
This will execute all the rspec tests tests under spec/unit as well as run puppet-lint. Rspec tests may have the same kind of dependencies as the module they are testing. While the module defines in its Modulefile, rspec tests define them in .fixtures.yml.
You can run the acceptance tests as well by issuing the following command
% bundle exec rake acceptance
Note however that this will cost you money as it launches resources in AWS.
Even if you have commit access to the repository, you will still need to go through the process above, and have someone else review and merge in your changes. The rule is that all changes must be reviewed by a developer on the project (that did not write the code) to ensure that all changes go through a code review process.
Having someone other than the author of the topic branch recorded as performing the merge is the record that they performed the code review.