You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When debugging publisher websites to see why something isn't working properly (for example, why GDPR consent strings are being picked up; or why an identity module is not providing IDs even though they're configured to), it's challenging to determine if it's simply because the module was not properly included during the build/download process.
I'd like to propose that we add comments to the top of the build that list the individual modules that were included in the build.
Steps to reproduce
Build prebid and look at the production version:
Expected results
From the example above, if we assume the build only included the pubmaticBidAdapter, userId, and id5IdSystem, then the comment at the top could look like this:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Type of issue
Feature Request
Description
When debugging publisher websites to see why something isn't working properly (for example, why GDPR consent strings are being picked up; or why an identity module is not providing IDs even though they're configured to), it's challenging to determine if it's simply because the module was not properly included during the build/download process.
I'd like to propose that we add comments to the top of the build that list the individual modules that were included in the build.
Steps to reproduce
Build prebid and look at the production version:
Expected results
From the example above, if we assume the build only included the
pubmaticBidAdapter
,userId
, andid5IdSystem
, then the comment at the top could look like this:If we go this route, we should do the same for the Downloads page
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: