-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal for Prebid Video Module #6271
Comments
@bretg @mike-chowla Plus, my humble opinion - I think it's a great idea. There's something unintuitive and sometimes complicated when connecting video players with prebid, organising it and allowing players to connect using their own submodules makes a lot of sense and would save publishers' dev time. |
Thx for the support! |
This seems like a promising idea in general. My initial feedback is that things need to be done "in the Prebid Way", at least in 4.X.
|
Hi, Thanks for this proposal ❤️ I'm not too familiar with video so I have some questions how this proposal relates to
Thanks in advance, |
Hi @muuki88 , the idea is to support both instream and outstream. I was not familiar with |
Hello all, This sounds really promising and am really looking forward to this. Adding my 2 cents:
use the utils.getGptSlotInfoForAdUnitCode() function, to support publishers that use GAM ad unit paths in Most, if not all, bidder adapters assume that the bid.adUnitCode going into the video player I have tried more clean solutions like pre bid request hooks to alter the video ad unit code to the div id In general, from my experience working with prebid outstream, there seems to be a lot of stuff to be More than happy to help on your venture @karimMourra! |
Hi @ocm-peter thanks for the feedback and help! Much appreciated! |
@karimMourra how's progress coming here? |
Hi @gglas we are finalizing our formal proposal which can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/112HPpxlWpyrrV8Y611kEQRnDMaG1DjYhVkbQf6Dgl0s/edit?usp=sharing |
Hi all, the final proposal can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sueL8EXnD-DViTIEBNayAzNNrYocdHtmEl7433g0f5I/edit?usp=sharing |
@karimMourra does this still address #5696 ? |
@patmmccann there are limitations because of what information the IMA SDK surfaces. We can determine when the ad impression came from a bid, but not when an ad error came from a bid |
Type of issue
Proposal to implement a Feature
Description
In order to make bidding on video easier for publishers, we would like to introduce a video module allowing Prebid to register with Video Players. Each Video Player would own and maintain a video submodule. The main module ensures that the submodule specified by the publisher is used, and acts as a standardized interface and bridge between Prebid and each submodule.
The video submodules in turn act as a bridge to the video player. They are responsible for ensuring the video is rendered and obtaining the oRTB video params. Said oRTB params would then be added to the bid request or made available when requested by a bid adapter.
This new feature would ease publisher pain points when integrating with Prebid, notably:
Project management
JW Player is willing to own the development of the Core Video Module, as well as the development of its player submodule, in collaboration with the Prebid community. Submodules for other video players can be developed by members of the community as well as the maintainers of the players.
Technical Details
Suggested Prebid API changes:
setConfig({videoModule: {args}})
Sample Video Module Config interface:
Definitions:
Prebid Implementation requirements:
dfpAdServerVideo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: