Add support for riscv64 #2356
Merged
Add support for riscv64 #2356
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kxxt
added a commit
to kxxt/archriscv-packages
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
Upstreamed: premake/premake-core#2356 Apply unix2dos to patch files because of CRLF line endings in upstream release tarball.
Jarod42
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
tritao
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
Jarod42
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
felixonmars
pushed a commit
to felixonmars/archriscv-packages
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
Upstreamed: premake/premake-core#2356 Apply unix2dos to patch files because of CRLF line endings in upstream release tarball.
samsinsane
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
Jarod42
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This PR adds support for riscv64. More specifically, this PR fixes building premake on riscv64: https://archriscv.felixc.at/.status/log.htm?url=logs/premake/premake-5.0beta3-1.log
How does this PR change Premake's behavior?
Support riscv64 architecture.
Anything else we should know?
Did you check all the boxes?
closes #XXXXin comment to auto-close issue when PR is merged)You can now support Premake on our OpenCollective. Your contributions help us spend more time responding to requests like these!