You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There was a bug in the monthly collection data of "by day" data. The line was:
if (ret) {
this->hourly_volume[time_m.tm_hour] += 1;
this->daily_volume[time_m.tm_mday] += 1;
}
This is wrong, because tm_mday has values from 1 to 31. On day = 31, the buffer overflowed. It is not clear whether this affected the next record in the data file:
The values of arpa_count seem correct, but this is worth an investigation.
The record is shifted by 1. We can fix that in the pandas analysis by changing the heads of the column, restating the first column as "d00", and computing "d31" as queries - sum(d01..d30).
Then, with pandas, we can compare the new d31 to the counter arpa. If we find a high correlation, this becomes suspicious!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There was a bug in the monthly collection data of "by day" data. The line was:
This is wrong, because
tm_mday
has values from 1 to 31. On day = 31, the buffer overflowed. It is not clear whether this affected the next record in the data file:The values of
arpa_count
seem correct, but this is worth an investigation.The record is shifted by 1. We can fix that in the pandas analysis by changing the heads of the column, restating the first column as "d00", and computing "d31" as
queries - sum(d01..d30)
.Then, with pandas, we can compare the new
d31
to the counterarpa
. If we find a high correlation, this becomes suspicious!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: