You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 28, 2021. It is now read-only.
Going back to #54 and #101 , on the discussion about making it easy for first timers to try the library, should we try to make it one folder instead of two? Similar to the change in #101 . Currently the only difference seems to be the visibility of the part that's screen-read.
This would be my proposed folder structure:
Examples folder would have just these files (ignore the names - they're just samples to illustrate my point):
index.html would have the css to display the different modes, but with a comment that would change to display:none
index.html would also have just app.js (probably renamed) uncommented, but all other files i.e. basicShapes.js , basicLines.js , et al commented with a prompt to users to uncomment the file they wish to see.
OR
just have app.js and a prompt for users to edit app.js in the code to basicShapes.js or the file they wish to try.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@mithru I think this is definitely better than what we have now. However, we can make it more beginner friendly in the sense that we can make it all in the UI. We can have different tabs or buttons to select different examples. This would obviously be a bigger project and I will leave it to @MathuraMG and @lm-n on what the priority is but this will be worth it in the long run.
Nature of issue?
Feature enhancement details:
Going back to #54 and #101 , on the discussion about making it easy for first timers to try the library, should we try to make it one folder instead of two? Similar to the change in #101 . Currently the only difference seems to be the visibility of the part that's screen-read.
This would be my proposed folder structure:
Examples folder would have just these files (ignore the names - they're just samples to illustrate my point):
With the following changes:
index.html would have the css to display the different modes, but with a comment that would change to
display:none
index.html would also have just app.js (probably renamed) uncommented, but all other files i.e. basicShapes.js , basicLines.js , et al commented with a prompt to users to uncomment the file they wish to see.
OR
just have app.js and a prompt for users to edit
app.js
in the code tobasicShapes.js
or the file they wish to try.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: