Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Option to exclude full scan port scan that exceed a certain threshold #379

Closed
r00tSe7en opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #416 or #459
Closed

Option to exclude full scan port scan that exceed a certain threshold #379

r00tSe7en opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #416 or #459
Assignees
@parrasajad
Labels
Priority: Medium This issue may be useful, and needs some attention. Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed. Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.

Comments

@r00tSe7en
Copy link

r00tSe7en commented Jun 30, 2022 •
edited by ehsandeep
Loading

Is it possible to add a parameter that a host opens a certain threshold number of ports to filter out to scan the next target.
For example, if an ip has opened 100 ports, then it will not continue to scan this IP.

   -port-threshold, -pts int              skip full port scan for defined port threshold

Example:

In the below example, hackerone.com host will be skipped when the open port counter is > 5 when running active port scanning.

echo hackerone.com | naabu -pts 5
@r00tSe7en r00tSe7en added the Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes. label Jun 30, 2022
@ehsandeep ehsandeep changed the title Can add an option. When the number of open ports detected by the same IP exceeds a certain number, only 80 and 443 ports are reserved Option to exclude full scan port scan that exceed a certain threshold Jul 4, 2022
@ehsandeep
Copy link
Member

Also mentioned here - #367

@ehsandeep ehsandeep mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2022
Closed
4 tasks
@ehsandeep ehsandeep added the Priority: Medium This issue may be useful, and needs some attention. label Jul 15, 2022
@parrasajad parrasajad self-assigned this Aug 19, 2022
@parrasajad parrasajad linked a pull request Aug 23, 2022 that will close this issue
add port threshold #416
Merged
@parrasajad parrasajad added the Status: Review Needed The issue has a PR attached to it which needs to be reviewed label Aug 23, 2022
@ehsandeep ehsandeep added Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed. and removed Status: Review Needed The issue has a PR attached to it which needs to be reviewed labels Aug 25, 2022
@ehsandeep ehsandeep linked a pull request Oct 25, 2022 that will close this issue
v2.1.1 #459
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@parrasajad parrasajad

Labels
Priority: Medium This issue may be useful, and needs some attention. Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed. Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

add port threshold projectdiscovery/naabu
v2.1.1 projectdiscovery/naabu
3 participants
@ehsandeep @parrasajad @r00tSe7en