You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we have bespoke support for passing a Hugging Face model name to ModelScan. While a nice feature, this expands the scope of ModelScan to larger than it needs to be:
Why Hugging Face and not other popular OSS model repositories?
We don't properly handle edge cases in HF and don't want to sign up to do so (e.g. HF tokens and models that require you to accept ToS)
Since we're still at a 0.x release, we should remove this capability before it is depended on and not properly maintained. Users can easily download models using their own methods (e.g. hugginface_hub, requests, etc. ) and then use ModelScan once it's available on local disk.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we have bespoke support for passing a Hugging Face model name to ModelScan. While a nice feature, this expands the scope of ModelScan to larger than it needs to be:
Since we're still at a 0.x release, we should remove this capability before it is depended on and not properly maintained. Users can easily download models using their own methods (e.g.
hugginface_hub
,requests
, etc. ) and then use ModelScan once it's available on local disk.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: