Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Encrypted storage for applications #22

Open
nustiueudinastea opened this issue Mar 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Encrypted storage for applications #22

nustiueudinastea opened this issue Mar 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
security

Comments

@nustiueudinastea
Copy link
Contributor

Ideally this should be done per application, using something like encrypted ZFS volumes. If Btrfs gains per-volume encryption, than Btrfs should be used.
@nustiueudinastea nustiueudinastea added enhancement New feature or request security and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 22, 2020
@nustiueudinastea
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another option is to use lvm encrypted volumes. An example Docker plugin that does this: https://github.com/containers/docker-lvm-plugin

@nustiueudinastea
Copy link
Contributor Author

Apparently ZFS has slow encryption with high impact on CPU usage, which might totally kill the small VMs that Protos is targeting.
Monitor how the situation evolves: openzfs/zfs#10066 and openzfs/zfs#9749

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
security
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nustiueudinastea