You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have an on-going issue with Azure NS records in pulumi-controlled DNS zones where nearly every deployment (80%+) triggers re-creating records due to the order of NS records changing.
This is an issue for us as we'd like to begin using --expect-no-changes.
I filed #243 back in May and I think it might be related.
Everything works as expected on the first pass, except for warnings:
Diagnostics:
azure:dns:NsRecord (root-ns):
warning: urn:pulumi:dev::pulumi-test::azure:dns/nsRecord:NsRecord::root-ns verification warning: "record": [DEPRECATED] This field has been replaced by `records`
warning: urn:pulumi:dev::pulumi-test::azure:dns/nsRecord:NsRecord::root-ns verification warning: "record": [DEPRECATED] This field has been replaced by `records`
On subsequent passes without code changes we almost always see a redeployment required where only the order of the NS records is changed:
I've tried various ways of sorting these records to try and prevent changes but none have worked. I'm not sure why that is, it seems the orders are being shuffled internally irrespective of the order in the definitions.
We have an on-going issue with Azure NS records in pulumi-controlled DNS zones where nearly every deployment (80%+) triggers re-creating records due to the order of NS records changing.
This is an issue for us as we'd like to begin using --expect-no-changes.
I filed #243 back in May and I think it might be related.
Everything works as expected on the first pass, except for warnings:
On subsequent passes without code changes we almost always see a redeployment required where only the order of the NS records is changed:
I've tried various ways of sorting these records to try and prevent changes but none have worked. I'm not sure why that is, it seems the orders are being shuffled internally irrespective of the order in the definitions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: