Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider dropping type duplicates in schema for resources #1745

Open
Tracked by #1788
viveklak opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #1788

Consider dropping type duplicates in schema for resources #1745

viveklak opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
impact/breaking Fixing this issue will require a breaking change kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user kind/enhancement Improvements or new features

Comments

@viveklak
Copy link
Contributor

viveklak commented Oct 1, 2021

Hello!

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

Currently we seem to add resources into types as well. This behavior has been supported for backward compatibility with perhaps pre-schema based implementation. We should take the opportunity to remove the unnecessary duplication at next major iteration

Affected area/feature

SDK size/surface area.

@viveklak viveklak added kind/enhancement Improvements or new features kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user labels Oct 1, 2021
@lblackstone lblackstone added the impact/breaking Fixing this issue will require a breaking change label Jul 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
impact/breaking Fixing this issue will require a breaking change kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants