(IPA: /หspaษกo/)
PureScript package manager and build tool.
Important
This documentation concerns the new PureScript rewrite of Spago. If you are looking for the Haskell codebase (versions up to 0.21.x), please head over to the spago-legacy repo.
Warning
This new Spago is still in alpha, so while most of it works well, there will be some rough edges here and there. Please report them if you find any!
The recommended installation method for Windows, Linux and macOS is npm
(see the latest releases on npm
here):
npm install -g spago@next
Other installation methods available:
- With Nix, using purescript-overlay
General notes:
- The assumption is that you already installed the PureScript compiler.
If not, get it with
npm install -g purescript
, or the recommended method for your OS. - You might have issues with
npm
and Docker (e.g. getting the message "Downloading the spago binary failed.." etc) You have two options:- either do not run npm as root, because it doesn't work well with binaries. Use it as a nonprivileged user.
- or use
--unsafe-perm
:npm install -g --unsafe-perm spago@next
Let's set up a new project!
$ mkdir purescript-pasta
$ cd purescript-pasta
$ spago init
This last command will create a few files:
.
โโโ spago.yaml
โโโ src
โย ย โโโ Main.purs
โโโ test
โโโ Test
โโโ Main.purs
If you have a look at the spago.yaml
file, you'll see that it contains two sections:
- the
workspace
section, which details the configuration for the dependencies of the project as a whole (which can be a monorepo, and contain more than one package), and other general configuration settings. In this sample project, the only configuration needed is the package set version from which all the dependencies will be chosen. See here for more info about how to query the package sets. - the
package
section, that is about the configuration of the package at hand, such as its name, dependencies, and so on.
For more info about all the various configuration settings, visit the section about the configuration format.
To build and run your project, use:
$ spago run
This will:
- download and compile the necessary dependencies (equivalent to
spago install
) - compile this sample project in the
output/
directory (equivalent tospago build
).
You can take a look at the content ofoutput/Main/index.js
to see what kind of JavaScript has been generated from your newMain.purs
file - run the generated JS, which is roughly equivalent to running
The above code imports the JS file you just looked at, and runs its
$ node -e "import('./output/Main/index').then(m => m.main())"
main
with Node.
You can also bundle the project in a single file with an entry point, so it can be run directly (useful for CLI apps):
$ spago bundle --bundle-type app --platform node
$ node .
Great! If you read unitl here you should be set to go write some PureScript without worrying too much about the build ๐
Where to go from here? There are a few places you should check out:
- see the "How to achieve X" section for practical advice without too much explanation
- see instead the Concepts and Explanations section for more in-depth explanations about the concepts that power Spago, such as package sets, or the Workspace.
- Design goals and reasons
- Developing and contributing
- How do I...
- Migrate from
spago.dhall
tospago.yaml
- Migrate from
bower
- See what commands and flags are supported
- Setup a new project using a specific package set
- Setup a new project using the solver
- Install a direct dependency
- Download my dependencies locally
- Build and run my project
- Test my project
- Run a repl
- Run a standalone PureScript file as a script
- List available packages
- Install all the packages in the set
- Override a package in the package set with a local one
- Override a package in the package set with a remote one
- Add a package to the package set
- Querying package sets
- Upgrading packages and the package set
- Custom package sets
- Monorepo support
- Polyrepo support
- Test dependencies
- Bundle a project into a single JS file
- Enable source maps
- Skipping the "build" step
- Generated build info/metadata
- Generate documentation for my project
- Alternate backends
- Publish my library
- Know which
purs
commands are run under the hood - Install autocompletions for
bash
- Install autocompletions for
zsh
- Migrate from
- Concepts and explanations
- FAQ
- Differences from legacy spago
Our main design goals are:
- Great UX: a good build system just does what's most expected and gets out of the way so you can focus on actually thinking about the software itself, instead of spending your time configuring the build.
- Minimal dependencies: users should not be expected to install a myriad of tools on their system to support various workflows. Spago only expects
git
andpurs
to be installed. - Reproducible builds: we exploit package sets and lock files to make your build reproducible, so that if your project builds today it will also build tomorrow and every day after that.
Some tools that inspired spago
are: Rust's Cargo, Haskell's Stack,
psc-package
, pulp
and bazel
.
We'd love your help, and welcome PRs and contributions!
Some ideas for getting started:
- Build and run
spago
- Help us fix bugs and build features
- Help us improve our documentation
- Help us log bugs and open issues
For more details see the CONTRIBUTING.md
This section contains a collection of mini-recipes you might want to follow in order to get things done with Spago.
You'll need to use spago-legacy for this.
# Install spago-legacy
npm install -g spago-legacy
# You can then create a `spago.yaml` file with `migrate`
spago-legacy migrate
# Ready to remove the dhall files and move to the new spago
npm install -g spago@next
rm spago.dhall packages.dhall
Note
The spago-legacy
NPM package has exactly the same content as the spago@0.21.0
release, which is the last one released from the legacy codebase, and the only release to contain the migrate
command. The new codebase's releases start from spago@0.93.0
.
Some packages might not be found or have the wrong version, in which case you'll have to carefully:
- try to run
spago install some-package
for packages found in the package set (see how to query the set) - add the packages that are missing from the set
In all cases, you'll want to switch to the new Registry package sets, so replace something like this:
workspace:
packageSet:
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/purescript/package-sets/psc-0.15.10-20230919/packages.json
...with this:
workspace:
packageSet:
registry: 41.2.0
This is because the legacy package set format - while being supported - is pointing at git repositories, so Spago will fetch them using git, which can get quite slow and error-prone.
The new package sets are instead pointing at the Registry, and can fetch compressed archives from our CDN, which is much faster and more reliable.
To figure out what package set you're supposed to be using, see the section about querying package sets.
You might also want to check out the section about differences from legacy spago.
Same as above, but with an additional spago init
command just after you install spago-legacy, so that the bower.json
file is converted into a spago.dhall
file.
For an overview of the available commands, run:
$ spago --help
You will see several subcommands (e.g. build
, test
); you can ask for help
about them by invoking the command with --help
, e.g.:
$ spago build --help
This will give a detailed view of the command, and list any flags you can use with that command.
Since spago init
does not necessarily use the latest package set. Fortunately, you can specify which package set to use via the --package-set
flag:
$ spago init --package-set 41.2.0
See here for how to ask Spago which sets are available for use.
Package sets are the default experience to ensure that you always get a buildable project out of the box, but one does not necessarily have to use them.
If you'd like to set up a project that uses the Registry solver to figure out a build plan, you can use:
$ spago init --use-solver
When using the solver (and when publishing a package), it's important to specify the version bounds for your dependencies, so that the solver can figure out a build plan.
You can ask Spago to come up with a good set of bounds for you by running:
$ spago install --ensure-ranges
To add a dependency to your project you can run:
# E.g. installing Halogen
$ spago install halogen
# This also supports multiple packages
$ spago install foreign aff
If you are using the Registry solver then the package must be available in the Registry, while if you are using package sets it needs to be contained in the set. See here to know more about adding more packages to the local set.
$ spago install
This will download and compile all the transitive dependencies of your project (i.e. the direct dependencies,
i.e. the ones listed in the dependencies
key of spago.yaml
, plus all their dependencies,
recursively) to the local .spago
folder.
However, running this directly is usually not necessary, as all commands that need the dependencies to be installed will run this for you.
Running spago fetch
is equivalent, but skips the compilation step.
You can build the project and its dependencies by running:
$ spago build
This is mostly just a thin layer above the PureScript compiler command purs compile
.
Note: by default the build
command will try to install any dependencies that haven't been
fetched yet - if you wish to disable this behaviour, you can pass the --no-install
flag.
The build will produce very many JavaScript files in the output/
folder. These
are ES modules, and you can just import
them e.g. on Node.
Note
The wrapper on the compiler is so thin that you can pass options to purs
.
E.g. if you wish to ask purs
to emit errors in JSON format, you can run
$ spago build --purs-args "--json-errors"
However, some purs
flags are covered by Spago ones, e.g. to change the location of the output
folder:
$ spago build --output myOutput
If you want to run the program, just use run
:
$ spago run -p package-name -m Module.Containing.Main
# We can pass arguments through to `purs compile`
$ spago run -p package-name -m Module.Containing.Main --purs-args "--verbose-errors"
# We can pass arguments through to the program being run
$ spago run -p package-name -m Module.Containing.Main -- arg1 arg2
Oof! That's a lot of typing. Fortunately it's possible to configure most of these parameters in the package.run
section of your configuration file, so you don't have to supply them at the command line.
See here for more info about this, but it allows us to instead write:
# The main module can be defined in the configuration file, but
# purs flags still need to be supplied at the command line
spago run -p package-name --purs-args "--verbose-errors"
# It's possible to even pass arguments from the config, which would look like this:
#
# package:
# run:
# main: Main
# execArgs:
# - "arg1"
# - "arg2"
$ spago run -p package-name
Lastly, if you only have a single package defined in the workspace with these parameters defined in the config file, you can just run
spago run
You can also test your project with spago
:
# Test.Main is the default here, but you can override it as usual
$ spago test --main Test.Main
Build succeeded.
You should add some tests.
Tests succeeded.
If you are using the spec-node
test runner,
you can use its command-line options to select a subset of tests with
--example
or rerun previously failed tests with --only-failures
:
$ spago test -- --example "some test"
$ spago test -- --only-failures
Note that you have to separate test runner options with a double dash --
to distinguish them from Spago's own options.
If you're on PowerShell (Windows), you will also need to quote the double dash:
> spago test '--' --example "some test"
> spago test '--' --only-failures
This has to do with an unfortunate interaction between Node bootstrapping mechanism and the way PowerShell handles parameters.
See the docs for more useful options.
As with the run
command, it's possible to configure the tests using the spago.yaml
- most importantly to separate test dependencies from the dependencies of your application/library.
Please see the section about the configuration format for more info, but in the meantime note that it's possible to install test dependencies by running:
$ spago install --test-deps spec spec-node
You can start a repl with the following command:
$ spago repl
You can run a standalone PureScript file as a script via spago script
.
Note: The module name must be Main
, and it must export a function main :: Effect Unit
.
By default, the following dependencies are installed: effect
, console
, prelude
.
You can run a script via the following, optionally specifying a package set to use, and additional dependencies to pull from there:
$ spago script --package-set 41.2.0 -d node-fs path/to/script.purs
It is sometimes useful to know which packages are contained in our package set (e.g. to see which version we're using, or to search for packages).
You can get a complete list of the packages provided by your workspace
(together with their versions, locations, and license) by running:
$ spago ls packages
By using the ls deps
command instead you can restrict the list to direct or transitive dependencies:
# Direct dependencies, i.e. only the ones listed in spago.dhall
$ spago ls deps
# Transitive dependencies, i.e. all the dependencies of your dependencies
$ spago ls deps --transitive
You can provide the --json
flag for a more machine-friendly output.
There might be cases where you'd like your project to depend on all the packages that are contained in the package set (this is sometimes called "acme build").
If you have jq
installed, you can accomplish this in relatively few characters:
$ spago ls packages --json | jq -r 'keys[]' | xargs spago install
Let's say I'm a user of the popular aff
package. Now, let's say I stumble upon a bug
in there, but thankfully I figure how to fix it. So I clone it locally and add my fix.
Now if I want to test this version in my current project, how can I tell spago
to do it?
There's a section of the spago.yaml
file just for that, called extraPackages
.
In this case we override the package with its local copy, which should have a spago.yaml
- our workspace
will look something like this:
workspace:
registry: 41.2.0
extraPackages:
aff:
path: ../my-purescript-aff
Now if we run spago ls packages
, we'll see that it is now included as a local package:
$ spago ls packages
+----------------------------------+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| Package | Version | Location |
+----------------------------------+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| abc-parser | 2.0.0 | - |
| ace | 9.1.0 | - |
| aff | local | ../my-purescript-aff |
| aff-bus | 6.0.0 | - |
| aff-coroutines | 9.0.0 | - |
| aff-promise | 4.0.0 | - |
...
Let's now say that we test that our fix from above works, and we are ready to Pull Request the fix.
So we push our fork and open the PR, but we want to already use the fix in our build, while we wait for it to land upstream and then on the next package set.
In this case, we can just change the override to point to some commit of our fork, like this:
workspace:
registry: 41.2.0
extraPackages:
aff:
git: https://github.com/my-user/purescript-aff.git
ref: aaa0aca7a77af368caa221a2a06d6be2079d32da
Warning
You can use a "branch", a "tag" or a "commit hash" as a version
.
It's strongly recommended to avoid using branches, because if you push new commits to a branch, spago
won't pick them up unless you delete the .spago/packages/aff/your-branch
folder.
Important
You still need to spago install my-new-package
after adding it to the package set, or Spago will not know that you want to use it as a dependency!
If a package is not in the upstream package set you can make it available in your build by adding it to extraPackages
.
There are a few possible scenarios - the most straightforward is when a package is already in the registry, then you just need to specify its version:
workspace:
registry: 41.2.0
extraPackages:
some-package-from-the-registry: 4.0.0
Another possibility is that the package is not in the registry (maybe it's your own fork?), but it's a git repo somewhere - e.g. if we'd like to add the facebook
package:
workspace:
registry: 41.2.0
extraPackages:
facebook:
git: https://github.com/Unisay/purescript-facebook.git
ref: v0.3.0 # branch, tag, or commit hash
Note
If the upstream library that you are adding has a spago.yaml
file, then Spago will just pick up the dependencies from there.
If that's not the case, then you'll have the provide the dependencies yourself, adding a dependencies
field.
The last possible case is the one picking up a local folder as a package (note: you'll need a spago.yaml
file in there):
workspace:
registry: 41.2.0
extraPackages:
facebook:
path: ../my-purescript-facebook
Since the versioning scheme for package sets does not tell anything about the compiler version or when they were published, you might want to have a look at the list of all the available ones. You can do that with:
$ spago registry package-sets
This will print a list of all the package sets ever releases, which could be overwhelming, as you'd likely only be interested in the latest one.
This is how you would ask for the latest package sets for each compiler version:
$ spago registry package-sets --latest
+---------+------------+----------+
| VERSION | DATE | COMPILER |
+---------+------------+----------+
| 10.0.0 | 2023-01-05 | 0.15.4 |
| 20.0.3 | 2023-04-08 | 0.15.7 |
| 27.2.0 | 2023-06-17 | 0.15.8 |
| 29.1.0 | 2023-07-18 | 0.15.9 |
| 42.1.0 | 2023-09-26 | 0.15.10 |
+---------+------------+----------+
If your project is using the Registry solver (i.e. no package set and only version bounds), then running spago upgrade
will try to put together a new build plan with the latest package versions published on the Registry, given that they are still compatible with your current compiler.
If instead you are using package sets, then spago upgrade
will bump your package set version to the latest package set available for your compiler version.
You can pass the --package-set
flag if you'd rather upgrade to a specific package set version.
You can of course just edit the workspace.packageSet
field in the spago.yaml
file.
Spago supports fetching custom package sets from URLs and paths, so you can build your own package set if you'd like - this is useful for example if you want to put together a custom package set for your company, or if you are using an alternate backend.
Spago will be happy to use a package set from a local path:
workspace:
packageSet:
path: ../my-custom-package-set.json
Otherwise you can point Spago to any URL on the internet:
workspace:
packageSet:
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/purescript/package-sets/psc-0.15.7-20230207/packages.json
...and it will try to fetch the content, parse it as JSON and conform it to one of the possible package set schemas.
The first one is what Spago calls a RemotePackageSet
, which contains some metadata, and a map of packages in the shapes (2), (3) and (4) described for extraPackages
in the configuration format section.
This package set could look something like this:
{
"compiler": "0.15.10",
"version": "0.0.1",
"packages": {
"some-registry-package": "1.0.2",
"some-package-from-git-with-a-spago-yaml": {
"git": "https://github.com/purescript/registry-dev.git",
"ref": "68dddd9351f256980454bc2c1d0aea20e4d53fa9"
},
"legacy-package-style": {
"repo": "https://github.com/purescript/purescript-prelude.git",
"version": "v6.0.1",
"dependencies": ["prelude", "effect", "console"]
}
}
}
The second format possible is what Spago calls a LegacyPackageSet
, and it's simply a map from package names to the location of the package, described as the (4) option for how to specify extraPackages
in the configuration format section.
Something like this:
{
"legacy-package-style": {
"repo": "https://github.com/purescript/purescript-prelude.git",
"version": "v6.0.1",
"dependencies": ["prelude", "effect", "console"]
},
"metadata": {
"repo": "https://github.com/purescript/metadata.git",
"version": "v0.15.10",
"dependencies": []
}
}
This is supported to allow for just using legacy package sets, and be able to automatically migrate spago.dhall
files to spago.yaml
files.
It is not recommended to craft your own package set in the legacy format - please use the RemotePackageSet
format instead - but if you do just be aware that you'll need to include a package called metadata
that has a version that matches the compiler version that the set is supposed to support.
You can use the graph
command to generate a graph of the modules and their dependencies:
$ spago graph modules
The same goes for packages:
$ spago graph packages
The command accepts the --json
and --dot
flags to output the graph in JSON or DOT format respectively.
This means that you can pipe the output to other tools, such as [graphviz
][graphviz] to generate a visual representation of the graph:
$ spago graph packages --dot | dot -Tpng > graph.png
...which will generate something like this:
Finally, the graph
command is also able to return a topological sorting of the modules or packages, with the --topo
flag:
$ spago graph modules --topo
Spago supports "monorepos" (see here as well for more monorepo goodness), allowing you to split a pile of code into different "compilation units" that might have different dependencies, deliverables, etc, but still compile together.
The vast majority of Spago projects will contain only one package, defined in the package
section of the same spago.yaml
that contains its workspace
.
It is however possible to define multiple packages in the same repository!
The basic rules are:
- a package is defined by a
spago.yaml
file containing apackage
section. - there can be only one
workspace
section in the whole repository, which defines the "root" of the current Spago Workspace. This defines your package set/build plan. - Spago will autodetect all the packages inside the workspace
- ...except for
spago.yaml
files with aworkspace
section, which will be ignored (together with their subfolders, as they establish a the boundary of another "workspace")
For more info about the concept of Spago Workspaces, see the dedicated section.
Since this might sound a little abstract, let's try to picture the case where you might want to have the packages lib1
, lib2
and app1
.
Then your file tree might look like this:
.
โโโ app1
โ โโโ spago.yaml
โ โโโ src
โ โ โโโ Main.purs
โ โโโ test
โ โโโ Test
โ โโโ Main.purs
โโโ lib1
โ โโโ spago.yaml
โ โโโ src
โ โโโ Main.purs
โโโ lib2
โ โโโ spago.yaml
โ โโโ src
โ โ โโโ Main.purs
โ โโโ test
โ โโโ Test
โ โโโ Main.purs
โโโ spago.yaml
Where:
-
the top level
spago.yaml
could look like this:workspace: packageSet: registry: 41.2.0
-
and the
lib1/spago.yaml
would look something like this:package: name: lib1 dependencies: - effect - console - prelude
-
then, assuming
lib2
depends onlib1
,lib2/spago.yaml
might look like this:package: name: lib2 dependencies: - effect - console - prelude - lib1 # <------ Note the dependency here test: main: Test.Lib2.Main dependencies: - spec
-
and then
app1/spago.yaml
would look something like this:package: name: app1 # Note that the app does not include all the dependencies that the lib included dependencies: - prelude - aff # This dep was not used by the library - lib2 # And we have `lib2` as a dependency
Given this setup, Spago will figure out that there are three separate packages in the repository.
You can select a package to perform operations on it by using the --package
flag, e.g. the follow will install the maybe
package in the lib1/spago.yaml
:
spago install -p lib1 maybe
The --package
flag is also available for many more commands, such as build
, run
, test
, bundle
and so on.
An important property of this "monorepo setup" is that the output
folder will be shared between all the packages: they will share the same build package set (or build plan when using the solver) and they will be all build together.
There might be cases where you want to have multiple loosely-connected codebases in the same repository that do not necessarily build together all the time. This is sometimes called a "polyrepo".
One such example of this could be a project that has a frontend and a backend, and they are both written in PureScript, but run on different backends: the frontend runs in the browser (so in JavaScript), and the backend runs on Erlang.
Let's say you might also want to share some code between the two (that was the point of using the same language, no?), so you might have a common
package that is used by both.
You can achieve all of this with Spago, by having multiple workspaces - let's try to visualise this.
The file tree might look like this:
.
โโโ client
โย ย โโโ spago.yaml
โย ย โโโ src
โย ย โย ย โโโ Main.purs
โย ย โโโ test
โย ย โโโ Test
โย ย โโโ Main.purs
โโโ common
โย ย โโโ spago.yaml
โย ย โโโ src
โย ย โย ย โโโ Main.purs
โย ย โโโ test
โย ย โโโ Test
โย ย โโโ Main.purs
โโโ server
โโโ spago.yaml
โโโ src
โย ย โโโ Main.purs
โโโ test
โโโ Test
โโโ Main.purs
Where the common/spago.yaml
is just a package with no workspace defined, as it's going to support both the JS and the Erlang backend:
package:
name: common
dependencies:
- effect
- console
- prelude
Then the client/spago.yaml
might look like this:
workspace:
packageSet:
registry: 41.2.0
extraPackages:
common:
path: ../common
package:
name: client
dependencies:
- prelude
- common
- halogen
And the server/spago.yaml
might look like this:
workspace:
packageSet:
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/purerl/package-sets/erl-0.15.3-20220629/packages.json
backend:
cmd: purerl
extraPackages:
common:
path: ../common
package:
name: server
dependencies:
- prelude
- common
- erl-process
This all means that:
- there is a Spago Workspace in the
client
folder, another one in theserver
folder, but none in thecommon
folder - the
common
package is shared between the two workspaces, note that it's included as a local package in both - the
client
workspace uses the default JS package set, and theserver
workspace uses a Purerl package set - to use each workspace you would need to
cd
into its folder, so that Spago can detect the workspace
Like this:
package:
name: mypackage
dependencies:
- effect
- console
- prelude
test:
main: Test.Main
dependencies:
- spec
You can add more with spago install --test-deps some-new-package
.
Use spago bundle
.
This is a good-defaults wrapper into esbuild
, and it's meant to be used for bundling small projects. Once your project grows in size, you might want to look into configuring esbuild
(or parcel
, or webpack
) directly.
See the esbuild
getting started for installation instructions.
This command supports a few options, and the most important ones are:
- the
--bundle-type
flag, which can be eitherapp
ormodule
- the
--platform
flag, which can be eitherbrowser
ornode
See the help message for more flags, and the configuration format section for how to configure these options in the spago.yaml
file.
When bundling an app
, the output will be a single executable file:
$ spago bundle --to index.js --bundle-type app --platform node
# It is then possible to run it with node:
$ node index.js
Note
Spago will bundle your project in the esbuild bundle format IIFE.
When bundling a module
instead, the output will be a single JS module that you can import
from JavaScript:
# You can specify the main module and the target file, or these defaults will be used
$ spago bundle --bundle-type module --module Main --outfile index.js
Can now import it in your Node project:
$ node -e "import('./index.js').then(m => console.log(m.main))"
[Function]
Spago does not wrap the entirety of the bundler's API (esbuild for JS builds), so it's possible to pass arguments through to it. E.g. to exclude an NPM package from the bundle you can pass the --external
flag to esbuild:
- either through the command line, with the
--bundler-args
flag, i.e.--bundler-args "--external:better-sqlite3"
. - or by adding it to the configuration file:
package: bundle: extra_args: - "--external:better-sqlite3"
When bundling, you can include --source-maps
to generate a final source map for your bundle.
Example:
spago bundle -p my-project --source-maps --minify --outfile=bundle.js
will generate a minified bundle: bundle.js
, and a source map: bundle.js.map
.
If your target platform is node, then you need to ensure your node version is >= 12.2.0 and enable source maps when executing your script:
spago bundle -p my-project --platform node --source-maps --minify --outfile=bundle.js
node --enable-source-maps bundle.js
If you are targeting browsers, then you will need to ensure your server is configured to serve the source map from the same directory as your bundle.
So for example if your server is configured to serve files from public/
, you might run:
spago bundle -p my-project --platform browser --source-maps --minify --outfile=public/bundle.js
When running spago bundle
, Spago will first try to build
your project, since bundling requires the project to be compiled first.
If you already compiled your project and want to skip this step you can pass the --no-build
flag.
Spago will include some metadata in the build, such as the version of the compiler used, the version of Spago, and the versions of the package itself.
This is so that you can access all these things from your application, e.g. to power a --version
command in your CLI app.
This info will be available in the Spago.Generated.BuildInfo
module, which you can import in your project.
The file itself is stored in the .spago
folder if you'd like to have a look at it.
To build documentation for your project and its dependencies (i.e. a "project-local
Pursuit"), you can use the docs
command:
$ spago docs
This will generate all the documentation in the ./generated-docs
folder of your project.
You might then want to open the index.html
file in there.
If you wish for the documentation to be opened in browser when generated, you can pass an open
flag:
$ spago docs --open
You can customize the output to other formats beyond html. Supported formats include ctags, etags, and markdown. For example to generate ctags for use in your editor:
$ spago docs --format ctags
Sometimes you'd like to pull up docs for dependencies even when you have compilation errors in your project. This is a good use case for the --deps-only flag:
$ spago docs --deps-only`
Spago supports compiling with alternate purescript backends, such as purerl.
To use an alternate backend, include the workspace.backend
section in your workspace's spago.yaml
. See the configuration format section for more info.
To publish your library to the PureScript Registry, you can run:
$ spago publish
...and follow the instructions ๐
Library authors will often build "ecosystems" of small interdependent packages that build on each other - if that's your situation, and you'd like to publish them all together (following some big refactoring, as it goes!), then you might wonder how to include the new version in the build plan of the next package to publish.
If you're using the registry solver then this is not an issue, but if your project is based on a package set, then that will not contain your newly published package, since well, you just published it!
You should be able to add the newly released version to your build plan by adding it to the extraPackages
section (see here):
package:
name: next-library-to-publish
dependencies:
- newly-published-library: ">=0.0.1 <0.2.0"
workspace:
packageSet:
registry: 41.2.0
extraPackages:
newly-published-library: 0.1.0
Note
This only works when the package you add to extraPackages
has been published to the registry. Adding a git dependency will produce an error, as publishing to the Registry only admits build plans that only contain packages coming from the Registry.
The -v
flag will print out all the purs
commands that spago
invokes during its operations,
plus a lot of diagnostic info, so you might want to use it to troubleshoot weird behaviours and/or crashes.
You can just add this to your .bashrc
:
source <(spago --bash-completion-script `which spago`)
or alternatively if you don't want to edit your ~/.bashrc
:
spago --bash-completion-script $(which spago) >> ~/.bash_completion
Note
If you installed Spago not with NPM, but with PNPM or some other package manager, this package manager might have bundled your installation and your package name in the script may end up being incorrect.
For example, when installed with PNPM, the resulting script will reference incorrect package bundle.js
instead of spago
.
If you're using something other than NPM, verify the referenced package name in the completions script.
Autocompletions for zsh
need to be somewhere in the fpath
- you can see the folders
included in your by running echo $fpath
.
You can also make a new folder - e.g. ~/.my-completions
- and add it to the fpath
by just adding this to your ~/.zshrc
:
fpath=(~/.my-completions $fpath)
Then you can obtain the completion definition for zsh and put it in a file called
_spago
(yes it needs to be called like that):
spago --zsh-completion-script $(which spago) > ~/.my-completions/_spago
Then, reload completions with:
compinit
Note
You might need to call this multiple times for it to work.
Note
See the note in the Bash section above when installing Spago with a package manager other than NPM.
This section details some of the concepts that are useful to know when using Spago. You don't have to read through this all at once, it's meant to be a reference for when you need it.
Spago considers a "package" any folder that contains:
- a
spago.yaml
file with a validpackage
section - a
src
subfolder with PureScript source files
That's all there is to it! You can have many of these in your repository if you'd like, and build them all together. See the monorepo section for more details.
The above holds for "workspace packages", i.e. the packages for which you have the source locally, and inside your repository. These are the packages "in your project".
Packages on which your project depends on can come from a few different sources:
- the Registry
- local packages - i.e. packages that are on your filesystem but external to your repository
- remote packages - i.e. packages that are not on your filesystem, but somewhere on the internet
The bulk of the packages in your build will come from the Registry (often via a package set), but you are able to add local and remote packages to your build as well, by adding them to the workspace.extraPackages
section of your spago.yaml
file.
See here and here for more info about how to add these "extra packages".
Packages have "dependencies", which are other packages that are required for them to build. These dependencies are listed in the dependencies
field of the package
section of the spago.yaml
file. See here for more info about the structure of a package
configuration.
The most generic way of defining a "package set" is "a collection of package versions that are known to build together". The point of a package set is to provide a "stable" set of packages that you can use to build your project, without worrying about version conflicts.
In practice, it looks something like this:
{
"version": "41.2.0",
"compiler": "0.15.10",
"published": "2023-09-15",
"packages": {
"abc-parser": "2.0.1",
"ace": "9.1.0",
"aff": "7.1.0",
"aff-bus": "6.0.0",
"aff-coroutines": "9.0.0",
"aff-promise": "4.0.0",
"aff-retry": "2.0.0",
"affjax": "13.0.0",
"affjax-node": "1.0.0",
"affjax-web": "1.0.0",
"ansi": "7.0.0",
"argonaut": "9.0.0",
...
}
}
The Registry maintains an "official" package set such as the above, which is used by default by Spago, and only contains packages that are contained in the Registry.
Whenever anyone publishes a new package version to the Registry, the pipeline will try to build this package together with the existing set, and if the build succeeds then the new version will be added to this official set.
However, Spago also supports using custom package sets, which can contain packages that are not in the Registry, and can be used to override existing packages with local or remote versions. See here for more info.
For any software project, it's usually possible to find a clear line between "the project" and "the dependencies of the project": we "own" our sources, while the dependencies only establish some sort of substrate over which our project lives and thrives.
Following this line of reasoning, Spago - taking inspiration from other tools such as Bazel - uses the concept of of a "workspace" to characterise the sum of all the project packages and their dependencies (including only "potential" ones).
A very succint introduction to this idea can be found in Bazel's documentation:
A workspace is a directory tree on your filesystem that contains the source files for the software you want to build.
Each workspace has a text file namedWORKSPACE
which may be empty, or may contain references to external dependencies required to build the outputs.
Directories containing a file calledWORKSPACE
are considered the root of a workspace.
Therefore, Bazel ignores any directory trees in a workspace rooted at a subdirectory containing aWORKSPACE
file, as they form another workspace.
Spago goes by these same rules, with the difference that we do not use a separate WORKSPACE
file, but instead use the workspace
section of the spago.yaml
file to define what the set of our external dependencies are, and where they come from.
This can be as simple as:
workspace: {}
...which means that "this is now a workspace, and all the dependencies are going to be fetched from the Registry".
Or it can be more complex, e.g.:
workspace:
packageSet:
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/some-user/custom-package-sets/some-release/packages.json
extraPackages:
aff:
path: ../my-purescript-aff
...which means that "this is now a workspace, and all the dependencies are going to be fetched using instructions from this custom package set (which could point to the Registry packages or somewhere else), except for the aff
packa