-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pkg resource needs a maintained backend #471
Comments
Note, PK isn't going away, it's just in maintainance mode. No need to panic. |
Then maybe you should change the title of the blog post.. |
For reference, these are some issues in PackageKit that @purpleidea opened and mentioned in a blog post:
|
@thkoch2001 Thank you for the nice summary! Know anyone that might be interested in hacking on any of these or helping to maintain packagekit? I think it's one of those rare (somewhat unloved) gems that's really worth saving and investing in. |
Some bad news...
@hughsie seems to be not maintaining packagekit anymore...
https://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2019/02/14/packagekit-is-dead-long-live-well-something-else/
Our
pkg
resource is backed by this, and tbh, I think it's a great solution. So we have to think about the future, and if someone will step up and continue maintaining this, or if we have to do the horrible task of re-writing ourpkg
resource to support multiple backends ourselves, or add multiple resources likepkg:dnf
andpkg:apt
and so on...Discussion and thoughts welcome!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: