Proper parameter ranges in Chen2020_plating #2030
Unanswered
Mrzhang-hub
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
I believe the issue might be because you change the maximum concentration in the electrodes but don't adjust the initial concentrations accordingly, so you might end up getting initial voltages above the cell cut-off. A way to go would be to determine the initial stoichiometry of the original parameters and, when you update the maximum concentration, update the initial concentrations so the stoichiometries remain the same. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am doing parameter sensitivity analysis and parameter identification using LGM50 battery from Chen2020_plating. But I could not find proper parameter ranges for these parameters. Because I need to choose parameters from parameter ranges randomly when identifying parameters, it sometimes goes wrong when the parameter set is chosen improperly. Following is the key part of my code
When randomly combining a parameter set to run the simulation, it sometimes gives the following mistake:
Experiment is infeasible: 'event: Maximum voltage' was triggered during 'Discharge at 0.5C until 2.5 V (5 seconds period)'. The returned solution only contains the first 0 cycles. Try reducing the current, shortening the time interval, or reducing the period.
So is there any paper that gives the proper parameter ranges for LGM50 battery?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions