Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
@brosaplanella @tinosulzer Would appreciate it if you could give your feedback in this regard. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Do you have a minimum working example? Changing the number of cycles should definitely affect EIS, so maybe you are taking the initial states for all cases rather than the final states. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello @brosaplanella and Everyone, I wonder If someone can help me in this regard, I still have the same issue as mentioned in the discussion. Your consideration is highly appreciated. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello Everyone,
As per the code in this discussion (ignore the errors in the discussion as it is solved), I am getting the EIS for different C-rates and different cycle numbers. Please see the below EIS figure for SEI growth enabled model.
Model options:
SEI – Solvent Diffusion Limited
Porosity change – True
I understand the behaviour for C-rate is reasonable because the higher C-rates have the impact on charge-transfer resistance and diffusion time constant.
But still I have the doubt about why increasing number of cycles does not reflect any significant changes in EIS.
Please provide your insights in this regard.
Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions