You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I am trying to run the following experiment(varying discharge from C/10 to 3C) varying the thickness of positive electrode and the porosities. Ideally with a thinner electrode the capacity retention should be better but here it shows that it remains the same irrespective of thickness or porosity.
exp_crates = pybamm.Experiment(
["Discharge at C/10 until 2.8V"] +
[(
"Charge at C/30 until 3.6V",
"Rest for 1 hour",
"Discharge at C/10 until 2.8V",
"Rest for 1 hour",
)]*3 +
[(
"Charge at C/30 until 3.6V",
"Rest for 1 hour",
"Discharge at C/5 until 2.8V",
"Rest for 1 hour",
)]*3)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi,
I am trying to run the following experiment(varying discharge from C/10 to 3C) varying the thickness of positive electrode and the porosities. Ideally with a thinner electrode the capacity retention should be better but here it shows that it remains the same irrespective of thickness or porosity.
exp_crates = pybamm.Experiment(
["Discharge at C/10 until 2.8V"] +
[(
"Charge at C/30 until 3.6V",
"Rest for 1 hour",
"Discharge at C/10 until 2.8V",
"Rest for 1 hour",
)]*3 +
[(
"Charge at C/30 until 3.6V",
"Rest for 1 hour",
"Discharge at C/5 until 2.8V",
"Rest for 1 hour",
)]*3)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions