You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't know if this is the channel for doubts, forgive me if I'm wrong.
I've been working with Orthanc for about 4 years, but now I met Pynetdicom and I was very happy with its documentation, examples and everything it offers, congratulations on the work!
My goal is to migrate to Python, using pynetdicom and pydicom, so as a challenge I created mystorescp.py with example code and everything worked, but to my surprise, when receiving larger files (Mammogram or RX) it is very slow, and it can be to 1 minute to save the received .dcm file.
So to compare, I used dcmtk's storescp and then I submitted the same study and it gets it instantly.
All tests were done "localhost".
Am I missing something?
Is this performance on pynetdicom normal?
Any help would be most welcome.
After researching a lot, I got this PR(#651), comparing with my version (dul.py) they are different, I imagine that this PR should be released in future versions, am I right?
Just for testing purposes, I made the same PR changes and it really solves the performance problem.
Special thanks to Matthew for helping with this issue.
I did the installation like this:
pip install pynetdicom
Why do I get a version without this important improvement?
Are there any other more active channels? How a Forum?
Hi Scaramallion,
Alright?
I don't know if this is the channel for doubts, forgive me if I'm wrong.
I've been working with Orthanc for about 4 years, but now I met Pynetdicom and I was very happy with its documentation, examples and everything it offers, congratulations on the work!
My goal is to migrate to Python, using pynetdicom and pydicom, so as a challenge I created mystorescp.py with example code and everything worked, but to my surprise, when receiving larger files (Mammogram or RX) it is very slow, and it can be to 1 minute to save the received .dcm file.
So to compare, I used dcmtk's storescp and then I submitted the same study and it gets it instantly.
All tests were done "localhost".
Am I missing something?
Is this performance on pynetdicom normal?
Any help would be most welcome.
This is mystorecp.py:
This is mystorecp.py:
https://pydicom.github.io/pynetdicom/stable/examples/storage.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: