-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ensure callspecs contain the list of marks #2675
ensure callspecs contain the list of marks #2675
Conversation
df81b08
to
c09055c
Compare
@@ -67,10 +67,6 @@ def extract_from(cls, parameterset, legacy_force_tuple=False): | |||
|
|||
return cls(argval, marks=newmarks, id=None) | |||
|
|||
@property | |||
def deprecated_arg_dict(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose this was never part of the public API given that it is a method of the new ParameterSet
class, but if I'm wrong then we should add a removal
changelog note.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it was a naming error, but we should add a removal message anyway
changelog/2672.removal
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
Internally change CallSpec2 to have a list of marks instead of a broken mapping of keywords |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: add a .
a the end of the sentence. 😁
c09055c
to
eb46258
Compare
this ensures we don't override in that area
the final parts of the transfer are still broken, but with the list, we at least have a chance to do better in future
this is also base to fix #1540 in future