-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stale keyword on PR is stale #387
Comments
We don't maintain the stale-bot. We may need to write our own GH action for it. 😕 I'm thinking it's ok to leave the stale label even after we add comment there, to indicate that this PR has been open for a while and hopefully we can continue paying attention to it until it gets closed. I personally think it's useful to see how many stale PRs got closed/merged in the end. Keeping the stale label gives that sort of visibility. |
I agree with @Mariatta and say we leave it as-is for a little while to see how it feels. If it ends up not feeling right then we can talk about what to do about it. |
This was likely a bug in https://github.com/actions/stale, now fixed: actions/stale#441. This issue can be closed. To confirm: This PR python/cpython#29147 was marked as stale on 29 Nov 2021 UTC. Some hours later a human left a comment. On the next cron run on 30 Nov 2021 UTC, the stale label was removed. Here's part of the log:
|
Thanks. |
Should the friendly bot remove the "stale" keyword when there is activity on a PR? See python/cpython#23427
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: