-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Python 3.7 runtime #267
Comments
Ok we are on this. |
We have added a 3.7 runtime to the default regions. |
There are some major caveats with this runtime.
@shivaram @ericmjonas any comments/ideas? |
Could you provide a breakdown on how the size increases after shrinkconda has run with scipy 1.1.0 ? Is it close to 512MB or is it much bigger ? And if I'm right, we currently have no runtime for 3.7 right ? I'm trying to understand if this is a regression or a new but limited feature |
No runtime for 3.7. So this a new but limited feature.
3.7:
3.6:
|
So the files in ./lib excluding ./lib/python3.x are the major differences (472-170=302MB vs. 386-192=194MB). And it is hard to tell what files are contributing to the differences. |
AFAIK, we didn't have 3.7 runtime support before. @shivaram |
So its basically there are .sos in ./lib that have gotten significantly bigger. I didn't list all the SOs because it would be too big to look at but here are the top few sos:
3.6:
|
I am not going to muck with the sos that the newer versions of numpy need. I think documenting this is the correct thing to do. If our runtime plans for 0.5 pan out this should be a non-issue in by v0.5. |
I think the 3.7 runtime falls into the "new feature with limited capability' category. But it might still be worth discussing if we want to publish it at all given it might cause a regression experience (broken user code after the upgrade). New users would likely opt for 3.7 as well. |
do we have any survey of how many of our users use scipy? There was even discussion removing this from the default runtime... I still think a working 3.7 runtime without scipy is much better than no 3.7 runtime. |
I am not aware of any such surveys. I could be convinced that providing some runtime for 3.7 is better than having no runtime. Is there a way we could warn users if/when they try to use scipy with 3.7 ? |
That would involve mucking with the serializer and would be very hacky. |
I'm going to close this issue and open a specific issue for adding scipy to 3.7 runtime. |
Python 3.7 has been released on June 27th: https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-370/
Pywren does not currently have a runtime for python 3.7:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: