Replies: 1 comment
-
Sounds good to me. We can deprecate the former in v0.12.0 and point to the latter, with removal in v0.13.0. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I think perhaps it would be quite informative as to rename
pole_density_function
topole_density_distribution
, as in these functions we are computing the quantitative density distribution rather than internally creating a functional representation of the pole distribution. Perhaps the new function name would be more clear for the user and more representative for those inspecting the code.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions