You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be greatly helpful if the compression ratio charts (e.g. https://quixdb.github.io/squash-benchmark/#ratio-vs-compression) included a hint on the "compression ratio" axis that said either "uncompressed:decompressed" or "higher scores are better" as it uses the opposite definition of "compression ratio" as compared to most other benchmarks (where the ratio is uncompressed/compressed) and to anyone that isn't familiar enough with an algorithm's performance on a particular dataset to orient themselves by seeing how it ranks (for example, I used cpp code with bzip2, which told me that there was no way 3.5 was uncompressed/compressed) wouldn't be able to figure out what's what.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be greatly helpful if the compression ratio charts (e.g. https://quixdb.github.io/squash-benchmark/#ratio-vs-compression) included a hint on the "compression ratio" axis that said either "uncompressed:decompressed" or "higher scores are better" as it uses the opposite definition of "compression ratio" as compared to most other benchmarks (where the ratio is
uncompressed/compressed
) and to anyone that isn't familiar enough with an algorithm's performance on a particular dataset to orient themselves by seeing how it ranks (for example, I usedcpp
code withbzip2
, which told me that there was no way3.5
wasuncompressed/compressed
) wouldn't be able to figure out what's what.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: