Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sintax error reading a 4 port touchstone file. #1228

Closed
wsteffe opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1229
Closed

Sintax error reading a 4 port touchstone file. #1228

wsteffe opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1229
Labels

Comments

@wsteffe
Copy link

wsteffe commented Feb 5, 2025

In the annexed project, the simulation of circuit monoliticOnLTCC.sch aborts with a parsing error at line 4 of file monoliticoOnLTCC_net.s4p.
May you please look at what is wrong. The same file is imported correctly in AWR Mirowave office.

An other minor problem is that after this error pressing "Go display Page" has no effect.

Thanks
Walter

monoliticOnLTCC_prj.zip

@ra3xdh ra3xdh added the bug label Feb 5, 2025
@ra3xdh ra3xdh linked a pull request Feb 5, 2025 that will close this issue
@ra3xdh ra3xdh mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2025
@ra3xdh
Copy link
Owner

ra3xdh commented Feb 5, 2025

I guess you are using the latest version from Git. This was a bug introduced after the recent component dialog refactoring. It is not related tos2p file,, the line 4 is in the netlist. The saving of Qucs equations became broken. I have added a fix in #1229. Wait until it will be merged and update your build. You have to fix the broken schematics by opening legacy equation properties dialog, checking the Put result in dataset box, and saving schematic. Or remove the equation and rewrite it from scratch if the previous point didn't help.

pressing "Go display Page" has no effect

Display pages are candidate for deprecation. These pages are kept only for backward compatibility. The placing diagram on schematic is preferred way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants