Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Certified Image Pipeline #2

Closed
davidnuzik opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Certified Image Pipeline #2

davidnuzik opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature A large new piece of functionality
Milestone

Comments

@davidnuzik
Copy link
Contributor

davidnuzik commented Apr 8, 2020

Epic covering building drone pipeline and images and the following below.

  • GoBoring compilation for FIPS compliance
  • UBI7 base image
  • Vulnerability scanning via trivvy
  • Support for multiple architectures
  • Leveraging multi-stage builds with common build image base
  • Template project for creating new certified image pipelines

Note: Rancher Federal team to take this and STIG these images. Then, via their own private repo/pipeline publish the STIG'ed images.

Related K3s issue: k3s-io/k3s#1503

@davidnuzik davidnuzik changed the title STIG'ed Universal Base Images FIPS and UBI Pipeline Apr 16, 2020
@davidnuzik davidnuzik added the kind/feature A large new piece of functionality label Apr 16, 2020
@davidnuzik davidnuzik added this to the initial milestone Apr 16, 2020
@cjellick cjellick modified the milestones: Beta, Alpha Apr 28, 2020
@davidnuzik davidnuzik mentioned this issue May 7, 2020
@davidnuzik davidnuzik changed the title FIPS and UBI Pipeline Certified Image Pipeline Jun 2, 2020
@davidnuzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bumping out of alpha milestone into beta. We're nearly there and happy with all we accomplished within the alpha timeframe. This is more of a formality on a PM level.

@davidnuzik davidnuzik modified the milestones: Alpha, Beta Jun 3, 2020
@davidnuzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing - we may come back to multi arch later if this is not done. This is not needed for MVP.

@davidnuzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Issue for multi-arch #91

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature A large new piece of functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants