Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider Using "pint" for Unit Conversion #66

Open
rdoddanavar opened this issue May 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Consider Using "pint" for Unit Conversion #66

rdoddanavar opened this issue May 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@rdoddanavar
Labels
future Potential feature or fix, not a short-term priority modeling Related to underlying math/physics models

Comments

@rdoddanavar
Copy link
Owner

rdoddanavar commented May 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Look at pint library: https://pint.readthedocs.io/en/stable/. Seems to have "batteries included", and could replace existing unit conversion utilities
@rdoddanavar rdoddanavar added modeling Related to underlying math/physics models future Potential feature or fix, not a short-term priority labels May 2, 2021
@rdoddanavar rdoddanavar self-assigned this May 2, 2021
@rdoddanavar
Copy link
Owner Author

Other options w/ old system:

  • Consider populating constants w/ scipy.constants module
  • Consider using internal references to avoid duplicated values

@rdoddanavar rdoddanavar mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rdoddanavar rdoddanavar

Labels
future Potential feature or fix, not a short-term priority modeling Related to underlying math/physics models
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rdoddanavar