-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node-local core assignment: core count decrease #20312
Merged
ztlpn
merged 16 commits into
redpanda-data:dev
from
ztlpn:flex-assignment-decrease-core-count
Jun 28, 2024
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6afa175
kvstore: allow constructing kvstore for extra shards
ztlpn 4c8c970
c/shard_placement_table: allow constructing tables for extra shards
ztlpn 3e397dc
cluster: take source kvstore as param in partition kvstore state move…
ztlpn 387beba
cluster: split partition kvstore move helpers to copy and remove
ztlpn ec34e57
cluster: consolidate kvstore state move helpers
ztlpn 5d11b69
s/disk_log_impl: introduce disk log kvstore state move helpers
ztlpn f344d4a
c/shard_placement_table: add remove_kvstore_state reconcilation action
ztlpn 102b846
c/shard_placement_table: better source shard state tracking in x-shar…
ztlpn 98b95ac
c/shard_placement_table/ut: add transfer failures to stress test
ztlpn 55fba66
c/controller_backend: add helper to transfer partitions from extra shard
ztlpn ae5eee7
c/controller: coroutinize controller::start()
ztlpn bad5466
c/shard_balancer: implement reducing core count
ztlpn d5a8d41
c/shard_balancer: reject core count decrease if over capacity
ztlpn 34e43b9
cluster: allow broker configuration update with decreasing core count
ztlpn 3c2c5b6
c/controller: allow decreasing core count
ztlpn a2a27c6
tests: add core count decrease test case to shard_placement_test
ztlpn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any reason why we process existing shard data concurrently, but extra shards one by one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No particular reason, but
scatter_init_data
is CPU-bound, so no benefit in doing it concurrently either.