We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v0.5.2会对 流程无关的部分做一次统一的性能优化 ,其中包括
性能优化结果
只有Elm和Regularjs实现的DEMO能在IE10下进行运行,所以只对比了这两个
上面只对运行做了profile,但实际上你可以发现,只有Regularjs和Elm的启动几乎是瞬间的,angular2运行性能不错,但是启动有非常明显卡顿,即使是如此简单的TODOMVC
为什么第二个case在某些浏览器中还是比Elm慢?因为有些流程相关的潜在问题
这个会在未来某个feature版本,比如0.6, 0.7 中进行优化尝试
不过大家可以参考下Elm的TodoApp的实现,代码比Regularjs多了三倍不止,孰优孰劣可以自行分辨。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
v0.5.2会对 流程无关的部分做一次统一的性能优化 ,其中包括
性能优化结果
只有Elm和Regularjs实现的DEMO能在IE10下进行运行,所以只对比了这两个
上面只对运行做了profile,但实际上你可以发现,只有Regularjs和Elm的启动几乎是瞬间的,angular2运行性能不错,但是启动有非常明显卡顿,即使是如此简单的TODOMVC
为什么第二个case在某些浏览器中还是比Elm慢?因为有些流程相关的潜在问题
这个会在未来某个feature版本,比如0.6, 0.7 中进行优化尝试
不过大家可以参考下Elm的TodoApp的实现,代码比Regularjs多了三倍不止,孰优孰劣可以自行分辨。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: