-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nixpkgs missing its Emacs packages #396
Comments
|
That's odd. These definitely are available in Nixpkgs if you evaluate it and the new search page shows them aswell (see link in OP). I've investigated a bit further and found that nodePackages, perlPackages, luaPackages and texlive packages are also missing. I've also looked into how that JSON is generated. It's the result of Although, would making Repology evaluate Nixpkgs directly be feasible @AMDmi3? That'd be the most accurate source. |
The issue is that adding a "sub package set" is costly for the packages search interface. Adding new packages into it made the issues with (the older, and the old) package search problematic. We can look into producing a full list that is independently used for repology import (and other people's data scraping desires). |
Definitely no. I won't do any complex parsing and depend on third party software.
That would be a solution. |
Closing since there's nothing to do here on repology side. |
Problem has been resolved! |
Nixpkgs has packaged 254 ELPA and 4601 MELPA packages but none of them show up on repology.org.
They're available under the
emacs{25,26}Packages
attribute sets (https://search.nixos.org/packages?query=emacs26Packages&from=0&size=10000&sort=relevance&channel=unstable).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: