-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement or improve documentation of sortkey in the extra fields #2977
Comments
It is not; there is no Zotero field that carries this meaning, and items in Zotero have no intrinsic order, so I have no information I could base this on.
which means it is not available this way, this list is exhaustive
using the BBT-specific format, from the same page:
|
Thank you for pointing out the BBT-specific format. It is still not accomplishing what I need it to do, I suspect it may have to do with how this is outputting as an annotation, as per:
I'm still trying to figure out how it should be output and to modify my input string accordingly. I will post if/when I figure it out, for future reference. |
The solution is to use |
Debug log ID
7T4QGVJV-euc/6.7.227-7
What happened?
I'm trying to modify the sorting of bibliographic entries in latex by appending SORTKEY as an extra field for the entries that I would like to manually sort (as per https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/128387/sort-bibliography-with-same-author-and-same-year-biblatex). However it's not clear to me whether this is actually implemented at all in betterbibtex, since it is not included in the table of extra fields (https://retorque.re/zotero-better-bibtex/exporting/extra-fields/index.html). If it is a current feature, some clarification on how to implement this in practice would be really helpful.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: