-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug?] Original-date in extra field does not appear in the bibtex file #3022
Comments
Hello @gitsroid,
Here’s how you can share your debug log:
After these steps, you will receive debug ID displayed in red. Please share this ID with Sharing your debug log gives Thank you. PS: If the Debug Log menu is not available, or if it fails to send the debug log, you can use the option under “Help” > “Send debug log to file.io”. |
Are you exporting as Better BibLaTeX? BibTeX doesn't know about origdate. |
Exporting as Better BibLaTex solves the problem. Thanks! |
Debug log ID
See the issue
What happened?
I want to add the original date of some works to my references. For that I put
original-date: YYYY
in the extra field. The problem: the original date is not added to my bibtex file. It generates the reference well when using zotero but not when using pandoc. If I puttex.original-date: YYYY
then it works with pandoc (because the original date is added to my bibtex file) but not via zotero.What is expected:
When adding
original-date: YYYY
to the extra field to be able to add to the references the original date via zotero and pandoc.Zotero version: 7.0.5
Betterbibtex version: 6.7.240
About the debug log: I have some private items and I have not seen the way of sending an edited debug log within betterbibtex menu. If you really need it for this issue, please, tell me a way of sending it edited (I also do not want to post it here).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: