-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cannot enter an 'editor' field (better BibLaTeX) #3048
Comments
Hello @svann576,
Here’s how you can share your debug log:
After these steps, you will receive debug ID displayed in red. Please share this ID with Sharing your debug log gives Thank you. PS: If the Debug Log menu is not available, or if it fails to send the debug log, you can use the option under “Help” > “Send debug log to file.io”. |
|
Edited, see above. |
you have |
I am so sorry, this is embarrassing. Sorry for wasting your time! |
Thanks for the feedback! Just so you know, GitHub doesn't let me control who can close issues, and @retorquere likes to leave bug reports and enhancements open as a nudge to merge them into the next release. |
No problem. You can also add them in the extra field as
and that will work for both BBT and Zotero itself |
Debug log ID
GTSMCP3J-refs-euc/6.7.250-6
What happened?
I cannot enter an 'editor' field, only an 'editors' field. When entering
tex.editors = Joe
it exports correctly, while entering
tex.editor = Joe
exports no editor. I came across this issue when I had book entry that only listed editors, no authors, and better biblatex had not exported any of them. This manual attempt at fixing things however did not help: it seems that my biblatex setup expects the 'editor' field, not 'editors'; if an entry only has the latter, it ignores them completely.
Another test is entering a post-script:
this results in a 'test' field for every item, but
outputs nothing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: