You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am currently utilizing iCallSV for identifying SVs from WES data. Upon examining the outputs, I observed that the "final.txt" file is derived from the "merged.txt" file by filtering out records where both sites fall within intergenic or intronic regions or are found in genes blacklisted for analysis.
My question is, can I solely rely on the "merged.txt" file for my analysis instead of using the "final.txt" file? In one of my analyses, the "merged.txt" file contained 104 records, whereas the "final.txt" file retained only 35 records after filtering out numerous TRA (Translocation) events.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am currently utilizing iCallSV for identifying SVs from WES data. Upon examining the outputs, I observed that the "final.txt" file is derived from the "merged.txt" file by filtering out records where both sites fall within intergenic or intronic regions or are found in genes blacklisted for analysis.
My question is, can I solely rely on the "merged.txt" file for my analysis instead of using the "final.txt" file? In one of my analyses, the "merged.txt" file contained 104 records, whereas the "final.txt" file retained only 35 records after filtering out numerous TRA (Translocation) events.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: