Are the syntactic dependencies only for RVWMO?

[kdockser]

The latest version of the spec says:
For the purposes of RVWMO, _rd_ syntactically depends on both _rs1_ and _rs2_.
Do we want to limit this to RVWMO? It seems like this should say:
For the purposes of the memory model, _rd_ syntactically depends on both _rs1_ and _rs2_.

[ptomsich]

@aswaterman Should we extend this to generically cover "the memory model"?

[aswaterman]

Technically, I think mentioning RVWMO is more correct: the term "syntactic dependency" only makes sense in the context of RVWMO (since that's where it's defined). And Ztso implementations are RVWMO-compliant, so this statement necessarily applies to Ztso, too.

To avoid confusion without creating a different ambiguity, I'll just delete the dependent clause.