Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 7, 2019. It is now read-only.

Investigate alternatives for Travis CI #291

Closed
salkinium opened this issue Sep 21, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

Investigate alternatives for Travis CI #291

salkinium opened this issue Sep 21, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@salkinium
Copy link
Member

salkinium commented Sep 21, 2017

I'm getting very tired of Travis CI, it needs way too much hand holding for something as simple as compiling our code. It's getting ridiculous.

We need to control the environment ourselves and not let Travis yank the rug out of under our feet like with their latest backwards-incompatible idiocy.
I want something where we can upload our own Docker container (@strongly-typed already has a few :-).

@salkinium
Copy link
Member Author

@salkinium
Copy link
Member Author

There's also LambCI, but it may be a little too advanced for what we need here.

@salkinium
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, I was wrong, it's not Travis CI faults, SCons has been updated to 3.0.0 and it has support for Python 3.5+. This is pretty exciting!

cc @strongly-typed @dergraaf @ekiwi @daniel-k

@salkinium
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry Travis CI, we still love you (somewhat).

@salkinium
Copy link
Member Author

I hotfixed this issue in #292.

@strongly-typed
Copy link
Member

Yeah, really love Docker (who does not?).
Just added to the maybe-someday list. Probably November+ is a good time to set this up, maybe in conjunction with CI-efforts at RCA ;-)

@strongly-typed
Copy link
Member

So, was too excited about how CircleCI performs, so I just opened #298. Will you merge?

@salkinium
Copy link
Member Author

I like opening issues and then magically they get implemented. Very nice!

@salkinium
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed by #298.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants