Conflic checking between Substrate and EVM Account

Feature	Substrate Account	EVM-Compatible Account	Potential Conflicts
Underlying Technology	Customizable blockchain framework.	Runs Ethereum smart contracts; uses Ethereum tools.	Different base technologies limit direct interoperability.
Account Format	Uses public-private key pair, SS58 address format.	Hexadecimal address format derived from public key.	Incompatible address formats can complicate cross-platform interactions.
Compatibility	Customizable, can integrate EVM if configured.	Directly compatible with Ethereum and its dApps.	Default configurations may not support cross-chain functionality without modifications.
Functionality and Use	Highly customizable, supports governance, staking.	Focused on smart contracts and dApps.	Substrate's broader functionality may not be fully utilizable in EVM without specific adjustments.
Security and Network	Additional security features can be designed.	Depends on Ethereum's security and features.	Security assumptions and features may differ, requiring careful integration planning.

More Additional Info

Issue Category	Description	Impact on Integration
Gas and Fee Mechanisms	Substrate uses flexible, customizable fee structures, different from the EVM's gas-based model.	Confusion and incompatibility in transaction fees leading to potential execution issues.
Consensus Mechanisms	Substrate supports various consensus mechanisms, which may not align with those used by EVM.	Affects block validation and network security; requires alignment for proper functionality.
Storage and State Management	Substrate and EVM manage storage and state differently, potentially causing inefficiencies or data loss.	Challenges in data management that could impact application performance and state consistency.
Event Handling and Logging	Different systems for events and logs can impact how dApps function and interact.	Ensuring consistent and accurate event logging and handling across both platforms is crucial.
Tooling and Developer Experience	Differences in development tools, languages, and environments between Substrate (Rust) and EVM (Solidity).	Learning curve and potential for bugs due to tool adaptation issues.
Upgradeability and Governance	Discrepancies in how Substrate and EVM handle upgrades and governance.	Possible governance conflicts and upgrade incompatibilities.
Inter-Contract Communication	Communication between Substrate and EVM contracts may require special protocols or bridges.	Adds complexity and potential failure points in contract interactions.