Update to v3.4.1

[sckott]

https://github.com/Turfjs/turf/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#301

[sckott]

most recent release https://github.com/Turfjs/turf/releases/tag/v3.4.1 https://www.npmjs.com/package/@turf/turf

[sckott]

methods that are no longer in new version of lawn:

• lawn_average
• lawn_deviation
• lawn_count
• lawn_filter
• lawn_max
• lawn_median
• lawn_min
• lawn_sum
• lawn_variance
• turf-erase has been renamed turf-difference to make its name more similar to the equivalents in other libraries.

lawn_jenks needs extra work to get to work again, see note within https://github.com/Turfjs/turf/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#301

lawn_quantile needs extra work to get to work again, see note within https://github.com/Turfjs/turf/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#301

remove lawn_reclass - its depredated in turf Turfjs/turf#306

remove lawn_size - its depredated in turf Turfjs/turf#306

[sckott]

hey @jhollist - sorry about the delay, got most things working, some things left to think about

note the work is on branch turf-v3, not on master

• lawn_jenks - should we keep this? we'd have to write the js from scratch, test commented out for now
• lawn_quantile - should we keep this? we'd have to write the js from scratch, test commented out for now
• lawn_aggregate - a new method collect http://turfjs.org/docs/#collect was introduced, i think to replace aggregate in part at least, now aggregate is gone from turf. should we just make this method defunct?
• should we add a function for the new method http://turfjs.org/docs/#collect ?

I added these new methods under the helper section of the turf docs

• feature
• multiLineString
• multiPoint
• multiPolygon
• geometryCollection

SOME METHODS NOT FOUND IN CURRENT TURF, MOVING THOSE METHODS TO NEXT MILESTONE

[jhollist]

My gut reaction is to have lawn mirror the current version of turf as closely as possible. Thus we could drop lawn_jenks and lawn_quantile, and replace lawn aggregate with a lawn version of collect.

Haven't looked at the other methods yet. Won't have much time next couple of weeks. Sorry.

[sckott]

Okay, and easier to just drop those too. those meta and assertions methods may push off until some later point if I can't sort out where they are

[jhollist]

Sounds good.

As far as submission to JOSS, I hope to work on that soon. Some potential confusion around licensing that EPA hasn't thought about it. If I don't get clarification in a timely fashion, I'll just ignore the issue and work up the submission.

[sckott]

Okay

[sckott]

moved methods not found in current turf release to new issue for next milestone #51