Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Weights when pooling data #114

Open
JoseAntonioOrtega opened this issue Apr 6, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Weights when pooling data #114

JoseAntonioOrtega opened this issue Apr 6, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JoseAntonioOrtega
Copy link

First of all, congratulations for a great package make life simpler for people working with DHS data.

I have some issue with how to pool the data. In your vignette https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rdhs/vignettes/introduction.html you are providing a useful tutorial, but it has problems in the data pooling part.

DHS weights are normalized weights with a mean of one. This means that if you use hv005 "as is" for pooled data analysis, you are giving more weight to surveys with more data, not necessarily a good idea. In fact, the DHS recommendation on how to pool data is included in the DHS sampling manual https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/DHSM4/DHS6_Sampling_Manual_Sept2012_DHSM4.pdf , p.28. The suggested approach is to de-normalize and renormalize according to the relevant measure (eg: country's population, ...).

It would be a great addition to provide the possibility of renormalization of weights getting the data for renormalization from statscompiler.

For the moment it would be good if the vignette shows how can it be done, or at least provides a caution note that the use of single survey weights is not advised for pooled survey analysis.

Thanks!

Session Info
@OJWatson OJWatson added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants