-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add event queue executor support. #52
Comments
@ZhenshengLee rolling branch could be the master branch, or? Indeed, we saw recently from measurements with G and zero-copy that for payloads < 64k the default executor has a higher impact on latency than the copies you have when not doing zero-copy |
You are right,
I've git it a test using APEX's performance_test tool(see custom version ZhenshengLee/performance_test@c71666d), and cpu usage reduced about 40% in the test below. ./colcon/install/performance_test/lib/performance_test/perf_test -c rclcpp-events-executor --msg Array1k -p 1 -s 10 -l log_sub
./colcon/install/performance_test/lib/performance_test/perf_test -c rclcpp-single-threaded-executor --msg Array1k -p 1 -s 10 -l log_sub Thanks. |
@ZhenshengLee I created the |
Brief feature description
Event queue executor was introduced recently by iRobot team as a strong mean to reduce the cpu overhead and latency by rclcpp layer.
See ros2/design#305 for details.
AFAK, event queue executor + rmw_iceoryx + zenoh(mentioned in eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx#869) is much more performant than current default ros2 layers, both in latency and cpu usage.
So event queue executor would be implemented in rmw_iceoryx, perhaps in the
rolling
branch.First of all, may
galactic
androlling
branch being created based onfoxy
branch?@Karsten1987 @budrusThanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: