Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The ioQueue is "SERIAL" ，so "dispatch_barrier_async" is not needed. #728

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2014
Merged

The ioQueue is "SERIAL" ，so "dispatch_barrier_async" is not needed. #728

merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2014

Conversation

kejinlu
Copy link

@kejinlu kejinlu commented May 24, 2014

No description provided.

@kejinlu
Copy link
Author

kejinlu commented May 24, 2014

@rs

Sorry for this mistake in my last PR.

  • @function dispatch_barrier_async
    *
  • @abstract
  • Submits a barrier block for asynchronous execution on a dispatch queue.
    *
  • @discussion
  • Submits a block to a dispatch queue like dispatch_async(), but marks that
  • block as a barrier (relevant only on DISPATCH_QUEUE_CONCURRENT queues).

rs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2014
Merge pull request #728 from kejinlu/master
fca4112 
The ioQueue is "SERIAL" ，so "dispatch_barrier_async" is not needed.
@rs rs merged commit fca4112 into SDWebImage:master May 24, 2014
@bpoplauschi bpoplauschi added this to the 3.7.0 milestone Jun 10, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.7.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@kejinlu @rs @bpoplauschi