Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#725 adding completition block when removing image from cache #732

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2014
Merged

#725 adding completition block when removing image from cache #732

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2014

Conversation

dchohfi
Copy link
Contributor

@dchohfi dchohfi commented May 29, 2014

#725 adding completition block when removing image from cache, added an extra method so we don't break compatibility with older versions

…an extra method so we don't break compatibility with older versions
@dchohfi
Copy link
Contributor Author

dchohfi commented May 30, 2014

@rs do you think this is appropriate?

@rs
Copy link
Member

rs commented May 30, 2014

Yes why not if it doesn't break the API and/or impact the performance.

@dchohfi
Copy link
Contributor Author

dchohfi commented Jun 2, 2014

@rs yah, it doesn't break 'cause I overloaded the method adding just an extra param to do the block call and no changes to performance or anything related, no property added or anything stored, just a block call on the main queue

@dchohfi
Copy link
Contributor Author

dchohfi commented Jun 4, 2014

@rs do you think you can merge this? I'm looking for that feature too! 💃

@bpoplauschi
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me. @rs Please comment if you disagree

bpoplauschi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2014
#725 adding completition block when removing image from cache
@bpoplauschi bpoplauschi merged commit 257da39 into SDWebImage:master Jun 10, 2014
@bpoplauschi bpoplauschi added this to the 3.7.0 milestone Jun 10, 2014
devedup pushed a commit to FilmFlexMovies/SDWebImage that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants