Deprecate rjournal_article() in favor of **rjtools** ?

[cderv]

Hi !

@mitchelloharawild I did the update of #517 based on rjtools bundled file.

In rjournal/rjtools#61 (comment) you raise the good question of rjournal_article() future now that rjtools exists. But you never opened an issue in this repo to ask here

I am unsure if they plan to continue providing the rjournal article format in their package as we encourage submissions in the rjtools HTML/PDF format.

I am ok with adding a deprecation warning inside rticles package to explain that now rjtools should be used. Initially we did the format as there was none, there is no point in keeping it inside rticles if it is not to be used to submit to R Journal

What should we do about this ?

Originally posted by @cderv in #517 (comment)

[cderv]

@dicook @mitchelloharawild what are your thoughts on this, considering rjtools seems to be the recommended way now ?

[dicook]

Definitely would vote “yes"

On 2 May 2023, at 7:13 pm, Christophe Dervieux ***@***.***> wrote: @dicook @mitchelloharawild what are your thoughts on this, considering rjtools seems to be the recommended way now ? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

cheers, Di

…

--- Dianne Cook ***@***.***

[cderv]

I have done it in #531 - basically it will produce a warning when rticles::rjournal_article() is used to point to rjtools

[github-actions]

This old thread has been automatically locked. If you think you have found something related to this, please open a new issue by following the issue guide (https://yihui.org/issue/), and link to this old issue if necessary.