update: add editor/extension information to bug report template #16986
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Veykril
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2024
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced May 9, 2024
This was referenced May 28, 2024
This was referenced Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When attempting to reproduce issues, I encounter difficulties due to differences in versions of LSP clients and editors (such as #16985, #16867, and more)
This sometimes consumes a lot of efforts from contributors to communicate the details about LSP client information. Therefore, I believe adding editor/extension information to the issue template would be helpful for problem reproduction.