-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First meeting (2018-02-20 17:00 UTC) #1
Comments
For the record: Etherpad right after this meetingRust CLI working groupMeta
Legend: Team members
Slogan ideasWriting CLI apps in Rust is a frictionless experience with known best practices that work across platforms, good documentation, and effortless distribution Definition of CLIA program that is launch in a terminal with parameter, no user interaction during the execution, and that do work on files, network and/or output to terminal ie not an ncurses TUI GoalsAreas
How to get there
Crate-wise, I think the thing that could be valuable is to expand on an idea I've seen floated from time to time, creating higher level abstractions over the existing libs. For example, std::path is pretty low level when you compare it to pathlib in Python. If we provide some higher level libs (at the cost of performance or lack of platform neutrality) that'd be a big help for people. They could then progress to the lower level stuff in inner loops Aspects of writing a CLI tool
Gotchas
Packaging (Not cargo-install)
If cargo-install is an important use case for dev tools, how much should we look at improving it? |
@killercup perhaps we could capture the etherpad snapshot in a file too? |
@yoshuawuyts the etherpad is versioned already, and most of the content will probably be duplicated in tracking issues, so I wouldn't bother :) |
@killercup ah yeah, makes sense! |
@killercup What about unifying |
I don't think improving serde adaptors is in scope for the CLI working group.
… Am 23.02.2018 um 09:39 schrieb Ivan Tham ***@***.***>:
@killercup What about unifying serde for different formats as such 3Hren/msgpack-rust#161 ? As well, can we join the conversation of CLI-WG?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
(will post the notes taken during the meeting here)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: