Question: Should we use highfive to allocate reviews/editors?

[booyaa]

Background: Highfive is a bot who allocates reviewers for pull requests (a request to make a change to a GitHub repository). Normally this is used for code based projects, but if we utilise this repo as a way for people to request a review of their draft (which is added in the form of a PR) we could treat these draft as code.

Warning: this may require membership of the Rust Community org to complete.

How to (this is how the Rust Wasm team enabled highfive on their repo): https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rust-wasm/issues/45

Please share your thoughts by either voting using the 👍 or 👎 emojis or commenting below.

[skade]

I like highfive and am better at running through a list of assigned tasks then picking my own.

[adityac8]

@booyaa @skade Should I add highfive?