You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Seeing as search engines are useless for searching for if this has been answered before I'll ask the question directly here. I apologize if it has been answered elsewhere.
crates.io (total):
lib.rs (monthly):
This crate is being used by an absurd amount of users and according to lib.rs >68 000 crates. Which states quite clearly that cfg-if is sorely wanted by Rust users. This crate is also very simple only supplying a single macro that is below a hundred lines of code.
There is thus a quite obvious question to ask: Why is this not part of the standard library? Why is it instead maintained as a separate crate by the Rust team?
I'd love to see this as part of the standard library as it'd be one less dependency one has to worry if it is going to be xz'ed in the dependency tree or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seeing as search engines are useless for searching for if this has been answered before I'll ask the question directly here. I apologize if it has been answered elsewhere.
crates.io (total):
lib.rs (monthly):
This crate is being used by an absurd amount of users and according to lib.rs
>68 000
crates. Which states quite clearly thatcfg-if
is sorely wanted by Rust users. This crate is also very simple only supplying a single macro that is below a hundred lines of code.There is thus a quite obvious question to ask: Why is this not part of the standard library? Why is it instead maintained as a separate crate by the Rust team?
I'd love to see this as part of the standard library as it'd be one less dependency one has to worry if it is going to be
xz
'ed in the dependency tree or not.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: