Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does T-lang have opinion on floating-point guarantees? #210

Closed
pnkfelix opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Does T-lang have opinion on floating-point guarantees? #210

pnkfelix opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

T-opsem wants to know if T-lang has a current opinion, or believes it may want to have a future opinion, about: rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#123

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

(this came up in T-opsem backlog bonanza today and after a couple rounds of interrogation, I said I would bring it up with T-lang today.)

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

We talked about this somewhat during today's @rust-lang/lang meeting. From that discussion, it's safe to say that the team does have various opinions on floating-point guarantees. :)

We're going to have further discussion around this in the context of language design principles, and then after that, see if someone wants to champion some design for floating-point guarantees in particular.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@rustbot labels -I-lang-nominated

Conclusion from our meeting today:

Yes, lang team cares, we would be happy to make decisions, but we would need a design meeting to get a real understanding.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 18, 2023

Error: The feature relabel is not enabled in this repository.
To enable it add its section in the triagebot.toml in the root of the repository.

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #t-infra on Zulip.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants