This document serves as a guide for editors and reviewers. Some conventions and content guidelines are specified in the introduction.
-
Use ATX-style headings (not Setext) with sentence case.
-
Do not use tabs, only spaces.
-
Files must end with a newline.
-
Lines must not end with spaces. Double spaces have semantic meaning, but can be invisible. Use a trailing backslash if you need a hard line break.
-
If possible, avoid double blank lines.
-
Do not use indented code blocks; use 3+ backticks code blocks instead.
-
Code blocks should have an explicit language tag.
-
Do not wrap long lines. This helps with reviewing diffs of the source.
-
Use smart punctuation instead of Unicode characters. For example, use
---
for em-dash instead of the Unicode character. Characters like em-dash can be difficult to see in a fixed-width editor, and some editors may not have easy methods to enter such characters. -
Links should be relative with the
.md
extension. Links to other rust-lang books that are published with the reference should also be relative so that the linkchecker can validate them. -
Links to the standard library should use rustdoc-style links described in Standard library links.
-
The use of reference links is preferred, with shortcuts if appropriate. Place the sorted link reference definitions at the bottom of the file, or at the bottom of a section if there are an unusually large number of links that are specific to the section.
Example of shortcut link: [enumerations] Example of reference link with label: [block expression][block] [block]: expressions/block-expr.md [enumerations]: types/enum.md
-
See the Conventions section for formatting callouts such as notes, edition differences, and warnings.
There are automated checks for some of these rules. Run cargo run --manifest-path style-check/Cargo.toml -- src
to run them locally.
Code examples should use code blocks with triple backticks. The language should always be specified (such as rust
).
println!("Hello!");
See https://rust-lang.github.io/mdBook/format/theme/syntax-highlighting.html#supported-languages for a list of supported languages.
Rust examples are tested via rustdoc, and should include the appropriate annotations:
edition2015
oredition2018
--- If it is edition-specific (seebook.toml
for the default).no_run
--- The example should compile successfully, but should not be executed.should_panic
--- The example should compile and run, but produce a panic.compile_fail
--- The example is expected to fail to compile.ignore
--- The example shouldn't be built or tested. This should be avoided if possible. Usually this is only necessary when the testing framework does not support it (such as external crates or modules, or a proc-macro), or it contains pseudo-code which is not valid Rust. An HTML comment such as<!-- ignore: requires extern crate -->
should be placed before the example to explain why it is ignored.Exxxx
--- If the example is expected to fail to compile with a specific error code, include that code so that rustdoc will check that the expected code is used.
See the rustdoc documentation for more detail.
The following are extensions provided by mdbook-spec
.
Most clauses should be preceded with a rule. Rules can be specified in the markdown source with the following on a line by itself:
r[foo.bar]
The rule name should be lowercase, with periods separating from most general to most specific (like r[array.repeat.zero]
).
Rules can be linked to by their ID using markdown such as [foo.bar]
. There are automatic link references so that any rule can be referred to from any page in the book.
In the HTML, the rules are clickable just like headers.
When assigning rules to new paragraphs, or when modifying rule names, use the following guidelines:
- A rule applies to one core idea, which should be easily determined when reading the paragraph it is applied to.
- Other than the "intro" paragraph, purely explanatory, expository, or exemplary content does not need a rule. If the expository paragraph isn't directly related to the previous, separate it with a hard (rendered) line break.
- This content will be moved to
[!NOTE]
or more specific admonitions in the future.
- This content will be moved to
- Rust code examples and tests do not need their own rules.
- Use the following guidelines for admonitions:
- Notes: Do not include a rule.
- Warning: Omit the rule if the warning follows from the previous paragraph or if the warning is explanatory and doesn't introduce any new rules.
- Target specific behavior: Always include the rule.
- Edition differences: Always include the rule.
- The following keywords should be used to identify paragraphs when unambiguous:
intro
: The beginning paragraph of each section - should explain the construct being defined overall.syntax
: Syntax definitions or explanations when BNF syntax definitions are not used.namespace
: For items only, specifies the namespace(s) the item introduces a name in. May also be used elsewhere when defining a namespace (e.g.r[attribute.diagnostic.namespace]
).
- When a rule doesn't fall under the above keywords, or for section rule ids, name the subrule as follows:
- If the rule is naming a specific Rust language construct (e.g. an attribute, standard library type/function, or keyword-introduced concept), use the construct as named in the language, appropriately case-adjusted (but do not replace
_
s with-
s). - Other than Rust language concepts with
_
s in the name, use-
characters to separate words within a "subrule". - Whenever possible, do not repeat previous components of the rule.
- Edition differences admonitions should typically be named by the edition referenced directly by the rule. If multiple editions are named, use the one for which the behavior is defined by the admonition, and not by a previous paragraph.
- Target specific admonitions should typically be named by the least specific target property to which they apply (e.g. if a rule affects all x86 CPUs, the rule name should include
x86
rather than separately listingi586
,i686
andx86_64
, and if a rule applies to all ELF platforms, it should be namedelf
rather than listing every ELF OS). - Use an appropriately descriptive, but short, name if the language does not provide one.
- If the rule is naming a specific Rust language construct (e.g. an attribute, standard library type/function, or keyword-introduced concept), use the construct as named in the language, appropriately case-adjusted (but do not replace
Tests in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust can be linked to rules in the reference. The rule will include a link to the tests, and there is also an appendix which tracks how the rules are currently linked.
Tests in the tests
directory can be annotated with the //@ reference: x.y.z
header to link it to a rule. The header can be specified multiple times if a single file covers multiple rules.
Compiler developers are not expected to add reference
annotations to tests. However, if they do want to help, their cooperation is very welcome. Reference authors and editors are responsible for making sure every rule has a test associated with it.
The tests are beneficial for reviewers to see the behavior of a rule. It is also a benefit to readers who may want to see examples of particular behaviors. When adding new rules, you should wait until the reference side is approved before submitting a PR to rust-lang/rust
(to avoid churn if we decide on different names).
Prefixed rule names should not be used in tests. That is, do not use something like asm.rules
when there are specific rules like asm.rules.reg-not-input
.
We are not expecting 100% coverage at any time. Although it would be nice, it is unrealistic due to the sequence things are developed, and resources available.
You should link to the standard library without specifying a URL in a fashion similar to rustdoc intra-doc links. Some examples:
We can link to the page on Option
:
[`std::option::Option`]
In these links, generics are ignored and can be included:
[`std::option::Option<T>`]
If we don't want the full path in the text, we can write:
[`Option`](std::option::Option)
Macros can end in !
. This can be helpful for disambiguation. For example, this refers to the macro rather than the module:
[`alloc::vec!`]
Explicit namespace disambiguation is also supported:
[`std::vec`](mod@std::vec)
Beware there are some limitations, for example:
- Links to rexports from
std_arch
don't work due to rust-lang/rust#96506. - Links to keywords aren't supported.
- Links to trait impls where the trait is not in the prelude doesn't work. Traits must be in scope, and there currently isn't a way to add those.
- If there are multiple generic implementations, it will link to one randomly (see rust-lang/rust#76895).
When running into a rustdoc limitation, consider manually linking to the correct page using a relative link. For example, ../std/arch/macro.is_x86_feature_detected.html
.
Admonitions use a style similar to GitHub-flavored markdown, where the style name is placed at the beginning of a blockquote, such as:
> [!WARNING]
> This is a warning.
All this does is apply a CSS class to the blockquote. You should define the color or style of the rule in the css/custom.css
file if it isn't already defined.
Idioms and styling to avoid:
- Use American English spelling.
- Use Oxford commas.
- Avoid slashes for alternatives ("program/binary"); use conjunctions or rewrite it ("program or binary").
- Avoid qualifying something as "in Rust"; the entire reference is about Rust.
The following are guidelines for the content of the reference.
The reference does not document which targets exist, or the properties of specific targets. The reference may refer to platforms or target properties where required by the language. Some examples:
- Conditional-compilation keys like
target_os
are specified to exist, but not what their values must be. - The
windows_subsystem
attribute specifies that it only works on Windows platforms. - Inline assembly and the
target_feature
attribute specify the architectures that are supported.
The main text and flow should document only the current edition. Whenever there is a difference between editions, the differences should be called out with an "Edition differences" block.